We are in the midst of a war. American forces are engaged in a dangerous conflict abroad. Yet instead of rallying around the country and its army, a large swath of the public remains focused on one thing: Donald Trump.

The real question is not why Trump is like Trump. The enduring puzzle is us.

How did a majority of Americans, across two presidential cycles, rally behind a candidate widely seen—even by many of his own voters—as self-absorbed, linguistically blunt, crude and theatrically abrasive?

People may debate the severity of these traits. Some see flaws, others authenticity. But one point is clear: Trump would not have been electable without conditions in American society that made his rise possible. Political figures rarely create such moments; they ride forces and trends already present. Trump, in that sense, is less a cause than a symptom. To understand him, we must examine the country that made him possible.

Political philosopher Thomas Hobbes argued that people look to government first for security, not virtue. When citizens feel unsafe—physically, economically, or socially—they will accept leaders they might otherwise reject. Order becomes more important than refinement. Under those conditions, voters tolerate the strongman, even the bully, if they believe he can restore stability.

Trump’s election suggests that a large portion of America did not feel secure.

Security, however, is not just about terrorism, jobs, or crime. It also concerns whether the political system itself feels........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)