History Cannot Be Rewritten Into Existence

There is a difference between interpretation and fabrication. That line is being crossed with increasing boldness in the discourse surrounding Israel. What we are witnessing is not a healthy debate over competing narratives. It is an attempt to overwrite documented history with politically convenient fiction.

For example, the claim that Jesus was a Palestinian is not just inaccurate. It is intellectually dishonest. Jesus lived and died as a Jew in Roman Judea. He spoke within a Jewish cultural and religious framework. He observed Jewish law. He preached to Jewish audiences. There is no ambiguity here. The term “palestinian” as a national identity did not exist in his lifetime. It did not exist for centuries after. To assign him a modern political identity is not reinterpretation. It is appropriation designed to serve a contemporary agenda.

This is not an isolated distortion. It is part of a broader effort to sever the Jewish people from their historical roots in the land of Israel. The narrative that Jews are foreign colonizers collapses under the weight of evidence. Jewish presence in the land is not a matter of belief. It is documented across archaeology, literature, and external sources spanning more than three thousand years.

Jerusalem was not symbolically Jewish. It was concretely Jewish. It functioned as the political, spiritual, and cultural center of Jewish life long before the emergence of Christianity and long before the rise of Islam. This is not based solely on Jewish texts. It is confirmed by external observers, including those who were openly hostile to the Jewish people.

Even the Romans, who destroyed the Second Temple and exiled large portions of the Jewish population, acknowledged this reality. They did not conquer an abstract idea. They conquered a people rooted in a specific land with a defined capital. Attempts to minimize or deny this........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)