Purpose: To explain how Israel’s failure to identify Hamas’s invasion capability as a catastrophic RED risk—and to apply disciplined DoD 5000 risk-governance principles—enabled the October 7 massacre.

The phrase “intelligence failure” has become a familiar explanation for October 7. It is accurate, but incomplete.

Israel possessed fragments of warning. Hamas trained for a coordinated assault. Personnel close to the Gaza border raised concerns. Indicators emerged that did not fit the prevailing assessment that Hamas was deterred and primarily interested in preserving its rule in Gaza.

The catastrophe occurred not simply because information was unavailable. It occurred because Israel’s national-security system failed to identify and characterize a Hamas invasion as a strategic risk and then convert uncertainty, warning, and dissent into protective action.

Probability is only half the equation

During more than four decades working in national-security research, systems engineering, and defense risk management—including as a RAND researcher and on major American defense programs—I repeatedly encountered a basic principle: risk depends on both probability and consequence.

Organizations naturally concentrate on probability. If experts consider an event unlikely, leaders tend to assign it a lower priority. But an event with an uncertain or seemingly low probability may still require urgent action when its potential consequences are catastrophic.

Under disciplined risk management, the most dangerous........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)