A declaration is not an outcome. It may serve political needs or mark a strategic pivot, but it rarely ends a war, especially when the other side has not agreed to stop fighting.

President Trump’s anticipated unilateral declaration of victory over Iran may reflect real and substantial achievements. The degradation of Iranian capabilities and a reassertion of American deterrence may support a claim that core U.S. objectives have been met. Even so, it is very unlikely that such a declaration will end hostilities. At most, it will reconfigure the conflict into a lower-intensity but persistent struggle, a shadow war defined by coercion, pressure, and intermittent force.

The reason is simple: wars end when both sides behave as though they are over, and Iran is not doing that. Tehran has rejected Washington’s terms, demanded a full cessation of attacks and compensation, and continues to use the Strait of Hormuz as leverage. Not through a total blockade, which would be economically self-defeating, but through a calibrated approach that pressures adversarial shipping while permitting selected “neutral” traffic, including Chinese and Pakistani tankers, to pass. This selective coercion allows Iran to impose costs without incurring maximum self-harm.

A unilateral American declaration does not resolve this strategy. It creates a........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)