On Monday, May 4, 30 House Democrats, led by Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-TX) and including prominent progressives such as Reps. Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez sent a formal letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The letter demands that the United States end its decades-long policy of official silence on Israel’s alleged nuclear program and publicly disclose highly sensitive details: the number and types of warheads Israel is widely believed to possess, delivery systems, uranium enrichment capabilities, activities at the Dimona reactor, and Washington’s understanding of Israel’s nuclear doctrine and “red lines.” The lawmakers frame this as a matter of transparency, consistency, and congressional oversight.

The letter has virtually no chance of success in the current Congress. But the real significance lies in the corrosive intent behind it: a growing radical faction within the Democratic Party that is willing to risk automatic cuts to U.S. aid to Israel during wartime, a potential regional nuclear cascade, and broader Middle East instability, all to play gotcha with Israel on false premises.

The legal and political trap

A formal U.S. determination that Israel possesses nuclear weapons, precisely what the lawmakers are demanding, would automatically trigger the Symington and Glenn Amendments. That would cut off nearly all American military and economic assistance to Israel, currently about $3.8 billion per year plus emergency supplements. But that is only the first problem. The letter’s most revealing sentence is its deliberately vague assurance that if a disclosure “would implicate U.S. laws concerning nonproliferation, we are ready to work with you to address those concerns through legislative action.” This wording offers no real commitment. It gives the signatories complete deniability: once the legal trigger is pulled, the damage is........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)