Pakistan’s constitutional debate has once again entered the national discourse. Conversations surrounding possible constitutional amendments, institutional restructuring and governance reforms are increasingly dominating legal and political circles. Yet the real issue before the country is not whether another constitutional amendment should be introduced, but whether the state is prepared to honestly confront the structural governance failures that continue to weaken democratic stability, economic progress and institutional performance.

The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, remains one of the most comprehensive constitutional documents in the developing world. It guarantees parliamentary democracy, federalism, judicial independence and fundamental rights. Over the decades, however, constitutional governance has repeatedly been shaped by political crises, institutional confrontations and administrative imbalances. Consequently, constitutional amendments have often emerged as corrective measures to address extraordinary situations.

Among these reforms, the 18th Constitutional Amendment undoubtedly occupies a historic position. It restored parliamentary supremacy, strengthened provincial autonomy and removed several distortions introduced during authoritarian periods. It represented a major democratic consensus and reaffirmed the federal character of the Constitution. Yet constitutional experience over the last decade has demonstrated that certain governance consequences of the post-18th Amendment structure require serious reconsideration.

This is not an argument against provincial autonomy. Nor is it a call for reversing democratic reforms. Rather, it is a recognition that effective constitutional governance requires a balance between decentralisation and national coordination. In several sectors, excessive fragmentation of authority between the Federation and the provinces has created administrative confusion, inconsistent policymaking and weakened institutional efficiency.

The abolition of the Concurrent Legislative List under Article 142 fundamentally altered Pakistan’s federal framework. While the intention was to empower provinces, the practical result in certain sectors has been regulatory duplication and policy incoherence. Areas such as higher education, environmental regulation, health emergencies, taxation coordination, energy planning, cyber governance and digital commerce require coordinated national frameworks. The absence of constitutional mechanisms for joint legislative........

© The Nation