menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

U.S. Officials Called Signal a Tool for Terrorists and Criminals. Now They’re Using It.

5 21
26.03.2025

For years, U.S. officials villainized end-to-end encrypted messaging apps like Signal as the domain of criminals and terrorists and a threat to national security.

As fallout over a Signal group chat about Yemen war plans ricocheted through Washington, however, CIA Director John Ratcliffe revealed at a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on Tuesday that the app is approved for official communication and even comes installed on agency computers.

One longtime critic of government attacks on secure messaging said it was a sign that everybody else should follow suit.

“For everyday Americans, this seems like an inadvertent but strong endorsement of the cybersecurity and privacy value that Signal represents — assuming you actually know who you’re adding to the given chats,” said Sean Vitka, executive director of the progressive group Demand Progress.

“Going Dark”

The highly sensitive discussion over whether and when to attack Houthis in Yemen included FBI Director Kash Patel, according to a blockbuster report Monday from The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg.

There was particular irony to an FBI director’s presence on the thread. For years, Patel’s predecessors Chris Wray and James Comey had lambasted end-to-end encryption. The FBI popularized the idea that terrorists and drug cartels were “going dark” on law enforcement, and that the government needed to step in to do something about it.

........

© The Intercept