Politics and pensions don’t mix: Retirees prevail in the Sooner State 

In a victory for Oklahoma retirees, the Oklahoma Supreme Court recently ruled that a law forcing state entities to divest from certain financial companies is unconstitutional. The decision sends a clear message to Oklahoma and every state: Public pensions must be managed in the best financial interests of retirees — not steered by political mandates. 

For the thousands of public workers who rely on the Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System, that ruling isn’t just a legal win. It is peace of mind.

At its core, the case was about whether politicians can dictate how pension funds are invested. The now-struck-down Energy Discrimination Elimination Act required the state to blacklist financial firms accused of boycotting fossil fuel companies and to divest from them, regardless of financial performance.

The court was unequivocal: Pension trustees, it said, are constitutionally required to act “solely in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries.” Forcing them to consider political criteria would create a “dual purpose” that directly conflicts with that duty. 

Pension funds exist for one reason only: to deliver strong, reliable returns for retirees. It means Oklahoma’s public servants can trust that........

© The Hill