Congress must define a new 21st century tariff doctrine
Sign Up Account Profile Log Out
Newsletters Morning Report 12:30 Report Evening Report Business Defense Health Care Technology Newsletter Energy & Environment Whole Hog Politics The Gavel The Movement
Technology Newsletter
NEWS Senate House Administration Courts Future America Media Campaign News Education In The Know Latino LGBTQ DC News Race & Politics State Watch Print Edition People in the News
POLICY Defense Health Care Energy & Environment Technology Transportation International Cybersecurity National Security Space Sustainability
BUSINESS Budget Taxes Personal Finance Lobbying
OPINION Columnists Congress Blog All Contributors Opinions – Campaign Opinions – Civil Rights Opinions – Criminal Justice Opinions – Cybersecurity Opinions – Education Opinions – Energy and Environment Opinions – Finance Opinions – Healthcare Opinions – Immigration Opinions – International Opinions – Judiciary Opinions – National Security Opinions – Technology Opinions – White House Submit Opinion Content
All Contributors Opinions – Campaign Opinions – Civil Rights Opinions – Criminal Justice Opinions – Cybersecurity Opinions – Education Opinions – Energy and Environment Opinions – Finance Opinions – Healthcare Opinions – Immigration Opinions – International Opinions – Judiciary Opinions – National Security Opinions – Technology Opinions – White House
Opinions – Civil Rights
Opinions – Criminal Justice
Opinions – Cybersecurity
Opinions – Energy and Environment
Opinions – Healthcare
Opinions – Immigration
Opinions – International
Opinions – National Security
Opinions – Technology
Opinions – White House
Submit Opinion Content
EVENTS Upcoming Events About
Sign Up Account Profile Log Out
Trump's retirement proposal
State of the Union Takeaways
Content from Google Cloud
Sanders, Mullin butt heads in Surgeon General confirmation hearing Health Care | 4 minutes ago
Schumer: State of the Union ‘was Donald Trump’s state of delusion’ Senate | 8 minutes ago
Opinion Congress must define a new 21st century tariff doctrine Opinions - International | 13 minutes ago
Bill Gates apologizes to foundation staff over Epstein ties Health Care | 13 minutes ago
Jeffries: Trump State of the Union ‘riddled with dirty rotten lies’ Health Care | 26 minutes ago
Federal judiciary asks for control of courthouses State Watch | 38 minutes ago
Opinion Japan’s Takaichi stands up to China and wins big Opinions - International | 43 minutes ago
WATCH: Two cars fall into sinkhole at traffic light in Nebraska Health Care | 49 minutes ago
Congress must define a new 21st century tariff doctrine
The Supreme Court’s decision that the sweeping tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act exceed the executive’s authority is a welcome restraint on the president’s abuse of tariff statutes. But the job remains only partially done.
The Supreme Court decision puts the ball squarely back in Congress’ court to complete the job of defining a new tariff agenda.
The Trump administration’s sweeping and volatile tariffs undermined the global system that had been in place for decades. President Trump had imposed the highest tariffs since 1934, increasing prices for American businesses, workers, farmers, ranchers, and families.
Tariffs are regressive taxes, hitting lower income Americans the hardest, deepening domestic inequality, and potentially creating an affordability crisis. Research from the nonpartisan Tax Foundation found that the administration’s tariffs amounted to an average tax increase of $1,000 per U.S. household in 2025. That cost is set to rise to $1,300 per household this year if the policies stay in place.
Yet there is increasing agreement that there is no going back to the tariff system that was in place prior to 2017. The global system of multilateral negotiations that gradually reduced global tariffs has lost both public and political support in the U.S.
China’s economic rise and rapid technological change, along with insufficient U.S. investment in education and social safety nets and declining middle class economic opportunity, left many workers behind. This has fueled frustration with the existing trade regime, and a shift towards the protectionism we are now seeing.
With the old regime discredited and a coherent new tariff regime not yet defined, Congress must take up its constitutionally mandated authority and legislate the key building blocks of a new tariff doctrine.
A 21st Century tariff doctrine must bring down prices, support American businesses and farmers, strengthen supply chains, and repair economic alliances.
Rebalancing constitutional tariff authority and legislating guardrails
Over the last several decades, Congress has delegated much of its trade authority to the president, giving successive administrations greater latitude in tariff implementation. This administration has abused these statutes, using them far beyond the intent of Congress. A new tariff doctrine should have congressional oversight with clear metrics, transparent review and periodic sunsets.
Now that the Supreme Court has ruled on Trump’s tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, Congress should reform the other tariff statutes. Statutes. This includes Section 338, an excessively broad statute not used since the 1930s, which should be repealed. Sections 232 and 301 should be reformed so that they are interpreted narrowly with congressional approval and imposed for a time-limited period.
Additionally, new tariff statutes are needed to address China’s practices, such as industrial overcapacity, where current law is insufficient.
Finally, Congress should pass legislation that defines clear parameters for tariff authority. It should prohibit using tariffs to raise revenue or for partisan political purposes, while mandating transparency and regular review and oversight.
In defining the parameters of a new 21st Century tariff doctrine, Congress should focus both on lowering tariffs and the burden on American families and businesses, and on defining the appropriate parameters for using tariffs.
Lawmakers should remove tariffs that burden families and businesses without serving the national interest. Good examples include foodstuffs still subject to tariffs and products not made in the U.S.
Tariffs should be used as leverage to unlock markets for American exports. The current tariffs can also be used as leverage to negotiate discrete sectoral or plurilateral agreements that would be approved by Congress.
Congress should keep a narrow set of tariffs tied to long-term competitiveness and security to further the following goals:
Modern Industrial Policy: Tariffs can be used as targeted, temporary protection for strategic technologies or national security sectors, and to encourage domestic supply chain development for strategic goods.
National Security: Tariffs should not be the first-line national security tool. When used, they must be narrow, evidence-based, allied-coordinated, and paired with export controls and industrial policy.
Climate Policy: Use tariffs to implement a carbon border adjustment mechanism to support clean U.S. production, penalize higher emission imports and prevent carbon leakage.
The Supreme Court has taken the first step. Congress now needs to pick up the ball and define a 21st Century Tariff Doctrine that lowers tariffs and prices, while countering non-market behavior, promoting domestic innovation, protecting national security, supporting alliances and empowering workers.
A successful tariff agenda must be implemented in coordination with allies and in tandem with a strong industrial strategy and a plan for workforce development and community support.
Orit Frenkel, Ph.D., is CEO of the American Leadership Initiative.
Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
More Opinions - International News
Gorsuch takes aim at fellow Supreme Court justices in tariff decision
Durbin whistleblowers accuse Patel of jet usage, decisionmaking that hindered ...
Wall Street Journal: ‘Smart play’ would have been for Trump to forgo, pause ...
5 takeaways from President Trump’s State of the Union address
Bessent on new Trump retirement plan: ‘We can do it through reconciliation’
Platner holds double-digit lead on Mills, Collins in Maine Senate race: Poll
Pennsylvania Democrats win state House special elections, keeping majority ...
Cornyn: Democrat winning Senate race in Texas would be ‘first crack in the ...
Live updates: Surgeon general pick Casey Means faces senators; Trump, GOP ...
Pam Bondi thought grand jurors were stupid. They showed her a thing or two.
Hegseth says he’ll order random pizzas to throw off monitoring app
End, don’t mend, the prime-time State of the Union address
Trump’s delusional State of the Union address
Senate Democrats emerge from secret Iran briefing warning of ...
Colbert on ‘silent defiance’ of Jeffries at State of the Union: ‘Bold ...
Watch live: Q&A with The Hill’s Editors – State of the Union Analysis
5 standout moments from Trump’s State of the Union address
Watch live: Casey Means, Trump’s pick for surgeon general, faces Senate ...
The Hill Podcasts – Morning Report
2024 Election Results
2024 Election Forecast
Regulation - Administration
Energy & Environment Video Clips
Health Care Video Clips
Technology Video Clips
Transportation Video Clips
International Video Clips
Cybersecurity Video Clips
National Security Video Clips
Contributors to The Hill
Submit Opinion Content
PRIVACY POLICY 09/30/2025
Advertise with Nexstar
Journalistic Integrity
THE HILL 400 N CAPITOL STREET NW, SUITE 650 WASHINGTON DC 20002
© 1998 - 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. | All Rights Reserved.
Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
Sign in to create a free account. No password needed.
By clicking on any of the sign up options below, you confirm that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use, which includes a jury trial waiver and class action waiver, and that you have read our Privacy Policy detailing our collection, use and sharing of your personal information.
By clicking on any of the sign up options below, you confirm that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use, which includes a jury trial waiver and class action waiver, and that you have read our Privacy Policy detailing our collection, use and sharing of your personal information.
The Hill is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.
Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.
The Hill is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.
Nexstar Media Group, Inc. is a leading, diversified media company that produces and distributes engaging local and national news, sports, and entertainment content across its television and digital platforms. The My Nexstar sign-in works across the Nexstar network—including The CW, NewsNation, The Hill, and more. Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.
Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
Check your email inbox
Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
Thanks for registering!
Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
Are you sure you want to log out?
