US sanctions just targeted Hezbollah’s real shield — the Lebanese state itself

The U.S. Treasury didn’t sanction a militia last week. It sanctioned a system.

Nine people were designated last Thursday — Hezbollah parliamentarians Hassan Fadlallah, Ibrahim al-Mousawi, Hussein al-Hajj Hassan, and Mohammed Fneish, but also Amal Movement security figures Ahmad Baalbaki and Ahmad Safawi, and an Iranian diplomat accused of coordinating Hezbollah’s regional support networks.

That list is not an escalation in degree. It is an escalation in kind.

But what is most significant is the designation of Colonel Samer Hamadi, who heads Lebanese Army Intelligence in the southern suburbs of Beirut — Hezbollah’s urban stronghold — and Brigadier General Khattar Nasser al-Din, who directs the Analysis Department at Lebanese General Security, the agency that controls passports and border movement. Neither commands combat troops. Both commanded information.

The Lebanese Army’s prompt public statement that its soldiers remain “loyal” following the Hamadi designation is itself revealing — an institution that felt no need to respond has suddenly felt compelled to. That defensive reflex is more telling against its documented backdrop: Washington had already canceled the Lebanese Armed Forces commander’s meetings over Lebanon’s failure to act on Hezbollah’s weapons — a diplomatic rebuke that preceded Thursday’s sanctions by months. The loyalty statement that followed is not institutional confidence. It is institutional cover.

For years, Washington sanctioned Hezbollah as though the group were a militia operating at Lebanon’s margins. It is not. Hezbollah survives because the Lebanese state — parts of its parliament, its security services, its administrative apparatus — has sheltered it, laundered its........

© The Hill