menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Discipline or abuse? This Texas case could change parental rights nationwide.

15 13
16.02.2026

Sign Up Account Profile Log Out

Newsletters Morning Report 12:30 Report Evening Report Business Defense Health Care Technology Newsletter Energy & Environment Whole Hog Politics The Gavel The Movement

Technology Newsletter

News Senate House Administration Courts Future America Media Campaign News Education In The Know Latino LGBTQ DC News Race & Politics State Watch Print Edition People in the News

Policy Defense Health Care Energy & Environment Technology Transportation International Cybersecurity National Security Space Sustainability

Business Budget Taxes Personal Finance Lobbying

Opinion Columnists Congress Blog All Contributors Opinions – Campaign Opinions – Civil Rights Opinions – Criminal Justice Opinions – Cybersecurity Opinions – Education Opinions – Energy and Environment Opinions – Finance Opinions – Healthcare Opinions – Immigration Opinions – International Opinions – Judiciary Opinions – National Security Opinions – Technology Opinions – White House Submit Opinion Content

All Contributors Opinions – Campaign Opinions – Civil Rights Opinions – Criminal Justice Opinions – Cybersecurity Opinions – Education Opinions – Energy and Environment Opinions – Finance Opinions – Healthcare Opinions – Immigration Opinions – International Opinions – Judiciary Opinions – National Security Opinions – Technology Opinions – White House

Opinions – Civil Rights

Opinions – Criminal Justice

Opinions – Cybersecurity

Opinions – Energy and Environment

Opinions – Healthcare

Opinions – Immigration

Opinions – International

Opinions – National Security

Opinions – Technology

Opinions – White House

Submit Opinion Content

Events Upcoming Events About

Sign Up Account Profile Log Out

Live updates: DHS shutdown

Content from Google Cloud

Opinion US diplomatic overload is at crisis levels  Opinions - International | 13 minutes ago

Trump says Guthrie kidnappers will face death penalty if she is killed Administration | 20 minutes ago

Opinion Congress launched our nation. It must embrace fact-based representation. Congress Blog | 43 minutes ago

FBI not sharing evidence in Pretti shooting, Minnesota authorities say State Watch | 1 hour ago

Iranian navy launches military exercises ahead of nuclear talks News | 1 hour ago

Teddy Roosevelt's descendants press senators on public lands Energy & Environment | 1 hour ago

Opinion Georgia’s Jan. 6 disbarment opinion sets an example for Republicans nationwide Opinions - Judiciary | 1 hour ago

Utah Republicans say they have support for redistricting ballot proposal  Campaign | 1 hour ago

Discipline or abuse? This Texas case could change parental rights nationwide.

In December 2023, the parental rights of two Texas parents were terminated after state officials determined they had violated provisions of the state’s Family Code. Those provisions allow termination in cases where a parent “engaged in conduct or knowingly placed the child with persons who engaged in conduct which endangers the physical or emotional well-being of the child.” 

The parents appealed that decision to the Texas Court of Appeals, which found that the trial court’s decision was supported by “evidence that Mother’s discipline of [the child] crossed the line into abuse in terms of lengthy wall stands or walls sits, by most accounts lasting for hours at a time, beatings with a belt, and kneeling on grains of dry rice for extended periods. Punishment … also included forms of food deprivation.” 

As to the father, the appeals court found that the trial court had sufficient evidence to conclude he had “knowingly plac[ed] the children with a person who engaged in conduct which endangered the children’s physical or emotional well-being.” 

About a year after the Court of Appeals decision, voters in Texas approved a ballot measure adding a parental rights amendment to the state constitution. It said, “that parents have the right ‘to exercise care, custody, and control of the parent’s child, including the right to make decisions concerning the child’s upbringing’ and the responsibility ‘to nurture and protect the parent’s child.’”  

The amendment passed overwhelmingly. 

Texas is not alone in its commitment to advancing parental rights, but the passage of the constitutional amendment gave new life to the Texas parents’ efforts above to restore their parental rights. Their case is now before the Texas Supreme Court. 

The court will decide whether parents’ right to “custody and control” of a child shields them from government interference even when they subject a child to the kind of treatment described above. The answer should be a clear and unequivocal “No.”  

The Texas Constitution protects parents so they can “nurture and protect” children. The way the parents above treated their children was neither of those.     

Both parents contend that the treatment of their children was nothing more than a “traditional [form] of discipline” that “may have fallen into disfavor in some parts of society,” and that it should “have no place in serving as a basis for termination.”  

Their positions are supported by some of the same groups that played prominent roles in the campaign for the Texas Parental Rights Amendment. One of them, the Family Freedom Project, describes the case this way: “Abuse and neglect do occur. Some of it can be described as horrific. Texas law has adapted over time to protect children from this very real threat. But there exists another, arguably equal, threat to children and families: state overreach.” 

“As a consequence,” it argues, “innocent parents in the crosshairs of DFPS must choose whether to comply with demands that far exceed any compelling state interest or risk the destruction of their family.” It calls on the court to limit “the government’s power to engineer families to fit its subjective liking, or to destroy them at its pleasure.”  

This libertarian argument has widespread political appeal in the Lone Star State. It also fits with the dominant approach of the Trump administration, which has made empowering parents central to its ideological agenda.

Advocates of parental rights are building on a long history of support by the U.S. Supreme Court. For example, in 1989, the court decided that the government has no constitutional duty to prevent child abuse by a parent.  

As former Chief Justice William Rehnquist explained, the Constitution imposes limits “on the state’s power to act.” It does not “guarantee … certain minimal levels of safety and security.” 

He added that the constitution “forbids the state itself to deprive individuals of life, liberty, and property without due process of law.” It does not “impose an affirmative obligation on the state to ensure that those interests do not come to harm through other means.” 

What the Texas Supreme Court decides in this particular case will be enormously consequential in setting a precedent about the scope and limits of parental rights. It will also affect the fate of children across this country. 

As Yale law professor Akhil Amar noted more than 30 years ago, an abused child who was abandoned by the state is like a slave left to the mercies of a slave master. 

In 2026, that is not something that anyone should condone anywhere. 

Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College.  

Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

More Opinions - Judiciary News

Homan says he doesn’t ‘know’ meaning behind Noem’s ‘right ...

Olympics turn political as US athletes speak out against Trump

Moore says Democrats need to ‘stop being the party of no and slow’ 

Donald Trump and the disgrace of Presidents Day

Republicans worry party won’t do enough to address costs before midterms

Noem boasts of Trump administration ensuring ‘we have the right people ...

Noem dismisses criticism of ‘right people’ voting for ‘right ...

Retired Army general predicts ‘formidable’ US military action against Iran ...

America is dangerously unprepared for a GPS attack

Why so many congressional Republicans are retiring

Trump says Guthrie kidnappers will face death penalty if she is killed

Trump announces Board of Peace members have pledged more than $5B toward Gaza

Pressure mounts on Trump, GOP ahead of midterms

Ty Cobb rips Trump admin over political attacks: ‘All those people should be ...

Live updates: DHS shuts down without funding deal; House and Senate out all week

Here’s how the DHS shutdown is impacting air travel, TSA

Georgia’s Jan. 6 disbarment opinion sets an example for Republicans nationwide

Christie: Trump admin putting up ‘a bunch of ham sandwiches’ and grand ...

2024 Election Results

2024 Election Forecast

Regulation - Administration

Energy & Environment Video Clips

Health Care Video Clips

Technology Video Clips

Transportation Video Clips

International Video Clips

Cybersecurity Video Clips

National Security Video Clips

Contributors to The Hill

Submit Opinion Content

PRIVACY POLICY 09/30/2025

Advertise with Nexstar

Journalistic Integrity

THE HILL 400 N CAPITOL STREET NW, SUITE 650 WASHINGTON DC 20002

© 1998 - 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. | All Rights Reserved.

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Sign in to create a free account. No password needed.

By clicking on any of the sign up options below, you confirm that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use, which includes a jury trial waiver and class action waiver, and that you have read our Privacy Policy detailing our collection, use and sharing of your personal information.

By clicking on any of the sign up options below, you confirm that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use, which includes a jury trial waiver and class action waiver, and that you have read our Privacy Policy detailing our collection, use and sharing of your personal information.

The Hill is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.

The Hill is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Nexstar Media Group, Inc. is a leading, diversified media company that produces and distributes engaging local and national news, sports, and entertainment content across its television and digital platforms. The My Nexstar sign-in works across the Nexstar network—including The CW, NewsNation, The Hill, and more. Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Check your email inbox

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Thanks for registering!

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Are you sure you want to log out?


© The Hill