Each year, as the Islamic calendar turns to Muharram, a familiar question resurfaces: why does a 7th-century event in the deserts of Karbala continue to command such deep emotional, political and ethical resonance across the world?

In the blistering heat of Karbala, a man named Hussain stood without an army. Without food. Without water. Without the political alliances that make victories inevitable. He stood with only his name, his faith, and a commitment not to bow to tyranny. Before him lay Yazid's empire, an empire fattened on fear and allegiance. Behind him stood history, watching.

The events of Karbala, though set in 7th-century Arabia, belong as much to our present as they do to the past. The image of a small group, led by Hussain ibn Ali, resisting the overwhelming machinery of a state that sought legitimacy through fear, feels uncomfortably familiar. Their isolation was moral. Karbala is a case study in how societies often fail the very people who stand for them.

Across the world today, this dynamic repeats with alarming regularity. Wherever truth is seen as a threat, and power demands submission rather than accountability, we are living in the shadow of Karbala. Whether in occupied territories, silenced courtrooms, or the unseen margins where communities are stripped of dignity, the choice presented by Ashura remains: compliance or conscience.

We are taught that the tragedy of Karbala is mourned because of its brutality. But its true horror lies in how familiar it........

© The Express Tribune