ASEAN Beat | Politics | Southeast Asia

Why Laos’ Communist Party Chose Continuity

With the economy still in a fragile state, the ruling Lao People’s Revolutionary Party has decided against significant changes at the top.

A government office in Vientiane, Laos.

After Laos’ National Assembly opened its first session on March 23, there was a clear sense that the country’s leaders believed they were on the right course. Thongloun Sisoulith was re-elected state president after securing another term as party chief in January. Sonexay Siphandone remained prime minister. Xaysomphone Phomvihane stayed on as National Assembly chairman. In other words, the Lao People’s Revolutionary Party (LPRP) opted for continuity.

But this was probably less a sign of confidence than of caution.

For months, there had been some speculation that one of the country’s top offices might change hands after the LPRP’s 12th National Congress in January. Xaysomphone, in particular, appeared to be a plausible candidate for elevation after ranking second in the new Politburo in January, ahead of Sonexay, who ranked third.

Yet when the moment came, the party stuck with the status quo. That choice says a great deal about how the Lao leadership now views its predicament. The country is emerging from an economic crisis (and potentially heading into a new one because of the war in Iran), and the party has likely concluded that this is not the time to gamble at the top.

The first reason is that the economy may be stabilizing, but it remains fragile. Laos was battered by the combined effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, years of structural weakness, and sky-high debt. By 2022, the kip had plunged, fuel shortages had spread, and inflation had surged to punishing levels. For ordinary Lao, the result was a collapse in living standards, with a significant number of people leaving the country to find work in Thailand. Imported goods became unaffordable, household budgets were ravaged, and public frustration became unusually visible.

Since late 2024, however, the leadership has been able to claim that the worst has passed. Inflation has come down, the currency has steadied somewhat, and the government now speaks of recovery rather than emergency. Importantly, public debt has fallen from a peak of 112 percent of GDP in 2022 to around 88 percent in 2025, at least according to official figures. But the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran has already laid bare many of the country’s problems, not least its lack of currency reserves, and a protracted conflict would hit the country hard.

Sonexay used the new parliament’s inaugural session to present the National Socio-Economic Development Plan for 2026-2030, with ambitious targets: average growth of 6 percent; public debt below 70 percent of GDP; inflation below 5 percent. The LPRP wants to tell both the public and foreign creditors that it has a plan, that the crisis is being managed, and that discipline is replacing drift. Many investors and creditors are skeptical; continuity helps sell that argument.

The second reason is that the party is already in the middle of a significant internal overhaul. In 2025, the LPRP began pushing through sweeping administrative reforms, merging ministries and state departments, reducing the size of the bureaucracy, and trying to claw back authority from the provinces. This is as much technocratic tidying as a political project. The current reforms suggest a deliberate attempt to reassert party control from Vientiane.

Such a project requires compliance and coordination, and not a dramatic change in leadership. Administrative restructuring is disruptive enough without also inviting questions about who is up, who is down, and which faction has won. By keeping Thongloun, Sonexay, and Xaysomphone in place, the party reduces one source of uncertainty while it tries to manage several others.

The third reason is more political. Continuity suggests the likely absence of consensus on succession. Laos’ system is opaque, but it is not random. Family networks matter, yet party seniority seems to matter much less nowadays. The Politburo lost experienced apparatchiks in January, yet several important ministers, including the finance and foreign ministers, do not serve on the elite decision-making body. Nor does the new public security minister, Vanthong Kongmany, who took the job from the sixth-ranked Politburo member, Vilay Lakhamfong, in January.

This suggests that ministerial office and real party power are becoming less closely aligned. One interpretation is that officials are rising faster through the state apparatus than through the more seniority-bound party hierarchy. Another is that the LPRP wants to concentrate strategic power even more firmly inside the party core while allowing the government to function as an executive arm.

One interesting development was the elevation of Viengthong Siphandone, the former president of the Supreme People’s Court. Her appointment as vice president was one of the few surprising decisions. She is Sonexay’s sister and the daughter of Khamtai Siphandone, the late revolutionary patriarch and former president.  She is also widely regarded as politically capable and institutionally experienced, and has a vast network of allies, including those of her husband, Khampheng Saysompheng, a former commerce minister and provincial governor. Yet she is not a Politburo member, which makes her selection unusual for such a high office, though she was ranked 13th on the party’s new Central Committee. Three of the past five vice presidents went on to become party chiefs/presidents or prime ministers.

All the while, Thongloun, the indomitable heavyweight of Lao politics, is 80. That fact alone has kept rumors alive about whether a mid-term adjustment might eventually be necessary. For now, continuity buys time.

That is perhaps the easiest way to understand what happened in March. The LPRP is signalling that there is too much unsettled to risk a bigger shake-up. The economy remains vulnerable, the bureaucracy is being remade, and power is being pulled back to the center.

A bigger unknown is whether the new lineup points to a looming anti-corruption campaign. Thongloun attempted one when he became prime minister in 2016, but most analysts would agree that it was a swift failure, especially compared to the one being conducted in neighboring Vietnam.

The biggest shakeup in recent months has been in the judiciary. Khamphanh Phommathat (ranked 4th on the Politburo) has become the new justice minister, replacing Phaivy Siboualipha, who last week became the new president of the Supreme People’s Court. Brigadier General Livong Laoly was approved as president of the Office of the Supreme People’s Prosecutor, and Vanxay Phongsavanh (ranked 13th on the Politburo) was appointed President of the State Inspection Authority. Moreover, Lieutenant General Vanthong Kongmany, the new public security minister since January, had been appointed governor of Attapeu province in 2023 to lead a major anti-graft campaign, which achieved some success.

A genuine effort to clean up the country’s endemic corruption would be a major event. Vietnamese politics has turned on anti-graft since 2016, making To Lam, the former public security minister and now party chief, by far the most powerful leader Vietnam has had since the early 1980s. If the LPRP were to go down a similar route, then it might spark a genuinely radical development in Laos’ otherwise tepid politics. After all, such campaigns give immense power to people who previously would have been prevented from wielding it, while also stripping power from those who previously believed they were untouchable.

Get to the bottom of the story

Subscribe today and join thousands of diplomats, analysts, policy professionals and business readers who rely on The Diplomat for expert Asia-Pacific coverage.

Get unlimited access to in-depth analysis you won't find anywhere else, from South China Sea tensions to ASEAN diplomacy to India-Pakistan relations. More than 5,000 articles a year.

Unlimited articles and expert analysis

Weekly newsletter with exclusive insights

16-year archive of diplomatic coverage

Ad-free reading on all devices

Support independent journalism

Already have an account? Log in.

After Laos’ National Assembly opened its first session on March 23, there was a clear sense that the country’s leaders believed they were on the right course. Thongloun Sisoulith was re-elected state president after securing another term as party chief in January. Sonexay Siphandone remained prime minister. Xaysomphone Phomvihane stayed on as National Assembly chairman. In other words, the Lao People’s Revolutionary Party (LPRP) opted for continuity.

But this was probably less a sign of confidence than of caution.

For months, there had been some speculation that one of the country’s top offices might change hands after the LPRP’s 12th National Congress in January. Xaysomphone, in particular, appeared to be a plausible candidate for elevation after ranking second in the new Politburo in January, ahead of Sonexay, who ranked third.

Yet when the moment came, the party stuck with the status quo. That choice says a great deal about how the Lao leadership now views its predicament. The country is emerging from an economic crisis (and potentially heading into a new one because of the war in Iran), and the party has likely concluded that this is not the time to gamble at the top.

The first reason is that the economy may be stabilizing, but it remains fragile. Laos was battered by the combined effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, years of structural weakness, and sky-high debt. By 2022, the kip had plunged, fuel shortages had spread, and inflation had surged to punishing levels. For ordinary Lao, the result was a collapse in living standards, with a significant number of people leaving the country to find work in Thailand. Imported goods became unaffordable, household budgets were ravaged, and public frustration became unusually visible.

Since late 2024, however, the leadership has been able to claim that the worst has passed. Inflation has come down, the currency has steadied somewhat, and the government now speaks of recovery rather than emergency. Importantly, public debt has fallen from a peak of 112 percent of GDP in 2022 to around 88 percent in 2025, at least according to official figures. But the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran has already laid bare many of the country’s problems, not least its lack of currency reserves, and a protracted conflict would hit the country hard.

Sonexay used the new parliament’s inaugural session to present the National Socio-Economic Development Plan for 2026-2030, with ambitious targets: average growth of 6 percent; public debt below 70 percent of GDP; inflation below 5 percent. The LPRP wants to tell both the public and foreign creditors that it has a plan, that the crisis is being managed, and that discipline is replacing drift. Many investors and creditors are skeptical; continuity helps sell that argument.

The second reason is that the party is already in the middle of a significant internal overhaul. In 2025, the LPRP began pushing through sweeping administrative reforms, merging ministries and state departments, reducing the size of the bureaucracy, and trying to claw back authority from the provinces. This is as much technocratic tidying as a political project. The current reforms suggest a deliberate attempt to reassert party control from Vientiane.

Such a project requires compliance and coordination, and not a dramatic change in leadership. Administrative restructuring is disruptive enough without also inviting questions about who is up, who is down, and which faction has won. By keeping Thongloun, Sonexay, and Xaysomphone in place, the party reduces one source of uncertainty while it tries to manage several others.

The third reason is more political. Continuity suggests the likely absence of consensus on succession. Laos’ system is opaque, but it is not random. Family networks matter, yet party seniority seems to matter much less nowadays. The Politburo lost experienced apparatchiks in January, yet several important ministers, including the finance and foreign ministers, do not serve on the elite decision-making body. Nor does the new public security minister, Vanthong Kongmany, who took the job from the sixth-ranked Politburo member, Vilay Lakhamfong, in January.

This suggests that ministerial office and real party power are becoming less closely aligned. One interpretation is that officials are rising faster through the state apparatus than through the more seniority-bound party hierarchy. Another is that the LPRP wants to concentrate strategic power even more firmly inside the party core while allowing the government to function as an executive arm.

One interesting development was the elevation of Viengthong Siphandone, the former president of the Supreme People’s Court. Her appointment as vice president was one of the few surprising decisions. She is Sonexay’s sister and the daughter of Khamtai Siphandone, the late revolutionary patriarch and former president.  She is also widely regarded as politically capable and institutionally experienced, and has a vast network of allies, including those of her husband, Khampheng Saysompheng, a former commerce minister and provincial governor. Yet she is not a Politburo member, which makes her selection unusual for such a high office, though she was ranked 13th on the party’s new Central Committee. Three of the past five vice presidents went on to become party chiefs/presidents or prime ministers.

All the while, Thongloun, the indomitable heavyweight of Lao politics, is 80. That fact alone has kept rumors alive about whether a mid-term adjustment might eventually be necessary. For now, continuity buys time.

That is perhaps the easiest way to understand what happened in March. The LPRP is signalling that there is too much unsettled to risk a bigger shake-up. The economy remains vulnerable, the bureaucracy is being remade, and power is being pulled back to the center.

A bigger unknown is whether the new lineup points to a looming anti-corruption campaign. Thongloun attempted one when he became prime minister in 2016, but most analysts would agree that it was a swift failure, especially compared to the one being conducted in neighboring Vietnam.

The biggest shakeup in recent months has been in the judiciary. Khamphanh Phommathat (ranked 4th on the Politburo) has become the new justice minister, replacing Phaivy Siboualipha, who last week became the new president of the Supreme People’s Court. Brigadier General Livong Laoly was approved as president of the Office of the Supreme People’s Prosecutor, and Vanxay Phongsavanh (ranked 13th on the Politburo) was appointed President of the State Inspection Authority. Moreover, Lieutenant General Vanthong Kongmany, the new public security minister since January, had been appointed governor of Attapeu province in 2023 to lead a major anti-graft campaign, which achieved some success.

A genuine effort to clean up the country’s endemic corruption would be a major event. Vietnamese politics has turned on anti-graft since 2016, making To Lam, the former public security minister and now party chief, by far the most powerful leader Vietnam has had since the early 1980s. If the LPRP were to go down a similar route, then it might spark a genuinely radical development in Laos’ otherwise tepid politics. After all, such campaigns give immense power to people who previously would have been prevented from wielding it, while also stripping power from those who previously believed they were untouchable.

David Hutt is a journalist and commentator. He is the research director at Publick Benefit, a social marketing agency, and a columnist at The Diplomat.

Lao People's Revolutionary Party (LPRP)

Laos National Assembly

Viengthong Siphandone

© The Diplomat