menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Justice Questions if Founders Would Be ‘Disarmed for Life’ Under Federal Drug Law

1 0
02.03.2026

Justice Questions if Founders Would Be ‘Disarmed for Life’ Under Federal Drug Law

Small Georgia Town Is at the Center of Latest ICE Fight 

Terrorist Threat in the US: ‘Stay on High Alert’

Virginia Court Fight Leaves Congressional Maps in Limbo 

Small Georgia Town Is at the Center of Latest ICE Fight 

It’s Official: Illegal Alien-Loving Dems Cannot Stand American Citizens

How the Heartland Is Reacting to Trump’s State of the Union

Most Americans Back Trump’s Deportation Goals, Reuters/Ipsos Poll Finds

 InternationalCommentary

Cracking Down on China’s Trade Cheating the Right Way

Time for Denmark and the United States to Secure Greenland

Daughter Pleads for Father’s Release From Chinese Prison 

What to Expect in PLA Activities Near Taiwan Leading Up to Trump and Xi Summit

EXCLUSIVE: Major Pro-Life Group Endorses Ohio’s Jon Husted for Senate

Golden Dome for America: The Secrecy Is Rational—the Cost Is Manageable—and the Imperative Is Inarguable

Amid Shutdown, 5 Major Homeland Security Responsibilities Are Unfunded

Congress Reacts to Iran Attack: Fetterman Praises, Jeffries Cautions

Virginia Court Fight Leaves Congressional Maps in Limbo 

Georgia Voters Support SAVE America Act—Even as State’s Democrat Senators Oppose It

Ohio Voters Send a ‘Clear Message’ With Support for SAVE America Act Provisions

Trump Calls on Senate to Pass SAVE America Act

Hegseth: Iran Strikes ‘Not Iraq,’ ‘Not Endless’

BREAKING: Trump Says Khamenei Is Dead. What Happens Now in Iran? 

International PoliticsSecurityNews

‘MAJOR COMBAT OPERATIONS’: Trump Announces Joint US-Israel Operation Against Iran

‘War Was Visited Upon These People’: Play About Oct. 7 Comes to DC

 International Commentary

Russia Operating ‘Systematic Child Abduction Operation,’ EU Ambassador Says

Meet the People Fueling Chaos in Minneapolis, New York, and Beyond 

OH BABY! Couples Could Make Big Money on Trump Accounts

What Comes Next for Venezuela? State Department Official Explains

Victor Davis Hanson: Trump’s Cost-Benefit Analysis for Striking Iran

What Susan Rice Really Meant by Her Retribution Threat

Health Care Commentary

Victor Davis Hanson: Cancer Update, ‘Your Prayers Work, Folks’

Victor Davis Hanson: The Pros and Cons of America’s Strike on Iran

Justice Questions if Founders Would Be ‘Disarmed for Life’ Under Federal Drug Law

Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch. (Erin Schaff-Pool/Getty Images)

Fred Lucas / @FredLucasWH

Fred Lucas is chief news correspondent and manager of the Investigative Reporting Project for The Daily Signal. He is the author of “The Myth of Voter Suppression: The Left’s Assault on Clean Elections.” Send an email to Fred.

Most justices appeared skeptical of a federal law banning gun possession for illegal drug users and addicts, during Supreme Court arguments Monday.

Intermingling gun rights and the war on drugs, the case has put the ACLU and the NRA on the same side, while Trump’s Justice Department is defending the existing law. 

The case comes out of Texas, where a federal grand jury indicted Ali Danial Hemani, a marijuana user, in February 2023 for violating a law prohibiting firearm possession by a user of illegal drugs or a controlled substance. He sued to dismiss the indictment. 

The federal prohibition is part of the 1968 Gun Control Act. 

Sarah Harris, the principal deputy solicitor general, on Monday argued the law doesn’t infringe on the Second Amendment in part because of longstanding “habitual drunkard” laws that have been around since the colonial era.

Those laws impose certain restrictions on individuals with addiction that could pose a danger to themselves or others, she noted.

Justice Neil Gorsuch asked, “whether this defendant would qualify as a habitual user.”

“The habitual drunkard, the American Temperance Society, back in the day, said has eight shots of whiskey a day, only made you an occasional drunkard,” he said. In the founding era, Gorsuch said, “you had to do double that.”

“John Adams took a drink of hard cider with his breakfast every day,” Gorsuch added. “James Madison reportedly drank a pint of whiskey every day. Thomas Jefferson said he wasn’t much of a user of alcohol; he only had three or four glasses of wine a night.”

“Are they all habitual drunkards who would be properly disarmed for life under your theory?” Gorsuch asked Harris.

Harris replied, “No,” adding of the defendant, “we know he uses marijuana a few times, about every other day.”

Harris later explained the law would apply to frequent users of harmful drugs, or those who are addicted. 

“An addict is someone who has an uncontrollable urge to use the substance, regardless of whether they have access to any particular moment in time. You can be an addict and not be an unlawful user, because, for instance, you’re in treatment,” Harris said.

She added, “An unlawful user, is someone judged by the objective criteria of their frequency of use and adding to someone who has an uncontrolled urge. They can overlap.”

The indictment said Hemani knowingly used illegal drugs while possessing a Glock 19 9mm pistol. The prosecution didn’t allege Hemani was intoxicated or using drugs at the time he possessed the firearm. Rather, prosecutors based their case on him being a regular drug user. 

Hemani challenged the indictment. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas granted the motion and dismissed the indictment, and the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal.

Other conservative justices Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh on Monday questioned whether the laws on illegal drugs are applicable to the old “habitual drunkard” laws. 

Justice Clarence Thomas also asked Harris how the laws she’s citing were different from older laws restricting the freedom of people who claimed to be fortune tellers. 

Meanwhile, all three liberal justices seemed skeptical of the government’s argument, as Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked if this rationale would allow for violating the constitutional rights of homeless people. 

Though later in the hearing, Chief Justice John Roberts pressed Hermani’s lawyer Erin Murphy about her arguments that the government should assess such matters on a case-by-case basis. 

“If you take the principle underlying habitual drunkards, the concept that the statutes back then require is somebody drinking to such success that they can’t care for themselves or their affairs, that they’ve lost self-control, that they’re posing a public safety risk,” Murphy argued. 

Roberts asked, “We’re going to assess those on a case-by-case basis, and apparently on an individual, by individual basis?”

Murphy responded the statute effectively calls for an individualized basis.

“You have to engage in an analysis of someone’s actual use to figure out whether they’re addicted to a controlled substance,” Murphy argued. “If the government wants to try to say a particular substance is so categorically addictive, dangerous, that you can’t use it regularly, OK, but it has to do that under the burden of proof.”

Roberts brought up older laws that prohibited firing a gun on New Year’s Eve and the current day restrictions on taking a gun into a courthouse. 

“It does indicate there’s some categories of views that were prohibited at the founding, whether it’s habitual drunkards, and in terms of the illegal use, based on particular individuals, or categories, or geographic limitations,” Roberts said. 

How Justices Reacted to Arguments in Women’s Sports Case

US Supreme Court to Hear Second Amendment Case Tuesday

Justices Hear Arguments on Concealed Carry in Stores

Read the first chapter of The Woketopus right now for FREE

Today, even with President Trump’s victory, leftist elites have their tentacles in every aspect of our government.

The Daily Signal’s own Tyler O’Neil exposes this leftist cabal in his new book, The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government.

In this book, O’Neil reveals how the Left’s NGO apparatus pursues its woke agenda, maneuvering like an octopus by circumventing Congress and entrenching its interests in the federal government.

You can read the first chapter of this new book for FREE in this eBook, The Woketopus: Chapter One using the secure link below.

The Tony Kinnett Cast

The Daily Signal Podcast

© 2025 The Daily Signal Media Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

We use cookies on our website. By using our website, you consent to cookies.  Learn More .  


© The Daily Signal