Dangerous Test Still Ahead for Artemis II Crew

Trump White House to Preserve Records Despite DOJ Opinion

Health CarePoliticsCommentary

I Went Undercover as a 13-Year-Old Anemic Looking for Abortion Pills

California’s High-Speed Rail Still Isn’t Running—But the Spending Never Stops

EXCLUSIVE: ICE Announces Arrests of Several Violent Criminals and Sex Offenders

Obama Judge Halts Trump Effort to End Parole for Hundreds of Thousands

House Passes Legislation to Combat Mexican Government’s Seizure of American-Owned Port

Judge, Longtime Thorn for Trump, Sides With Administration

How China Dominates the World’s Critical Minerals Production

Reclaiming the Lunar High Ground

The Space Race Is Back: NASA Prepares for Liftoff of Deep Space Exploration Crew

China’s Military Went Silent Around Taiwan for First Time in Years. Why?

DOJ: Bondi Does Not Need to Testify Before Congress

GOP Announces a Historic Investment to Save the Senate Majority

EXCLUSIVE: Chip Roy Urges Feds to Roll Back Obama-Era Ban on Collecting Immigration Data in Schools

GOP Wins Race to Replace MTG—But District Shifts Double-Digits Toward Dems

Trump’s Election Integrity Order Faces Wave of Lawsuits Before Dem-Appointed Judges

Democrats Sue to Stop Trump’s Latest Election Integrity Effort

Trump Mail-In Ballot Order Sets Up Battle With States

4 Key Election Law Battles Hitting Court Rooms During 2026 Midterms

Trump Bullish on Iran Deal, but Uncertainty Remains

Where Do Dem Presidential Favorites Stand on Israel?

 PoliticsSecurityNews

Trump Claims Gold Star Families Told Him to ‘Finish the Job’ in Iran

Citing ‘Echo Chamber’ on Iran, Trump Counterterrorism Chief Resigns

Conservative and Proud: Is the Right Representing Women? 

Girl Boss vs. Trad Wife: Forced to Choose?

Beyond the Oyster Fork: An Etiquette Expert’s Tips for ‘Relationships, Work, and Life’

Is the Iran Operation ‘America First’?

If Donald Trump Did What Obama Did, Media Would Cheer—So Why the Outrage Now?

Victor Davis Hanson: Trump Could Crush Iran, So Why Doesn’t He?

The Democrats Have Descended Into Utter Nihilism

Victor Davis Hanson: The New Democratic Party

Health CarePoliticsCommentary

I Went Undercover as a 13-Year-Old Anemic Looking for Abortion Pills

Martin Makary, commissioner of the FDA in the District of Columbia on January 7, 2026. (Celal Gunes/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Dr. Christina Francis

Dr. Christina Francis is a board-certified OB-GYN who works as an OB-GYN Hospitalist and is the CEO of the American Association of Pro-Life OB-GYNs.

Champions for abortion pill access claim that abortion drugs are medical care, that it is a “simple healthcare intervention,” and that we do not need to worry about the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rolling back safety protocols. 

But the truth is, it’s become nothing more than online commerce—not telemedicine. An April 7 ruling granted the FDA’s request to pause a case challenging access to mifepristone, which is used in abortions while acknowledging the harm these drugs cause. 

As a board-certified OB-GYN, I know what good telemedicine looks like and how it can fill gaps, especially in healthcare deserts. Both pro-life and pro-abortion physicians should be able to agree that access cannot trump all other stipulations for care, especially for a drug that assumes (and requires) clinician interface of some kind. 

In real telemedicine, the patient is still seeing a clinician. One of the upsides of it is that it lets you see your healthcare professional without going to their office. For many patients, this can eliminate barriers to care. 

But this only works if actual medical oversight occurs and if the condition being treated is not something that requires an in-person evaluation to fully assess the status of the patient.

At a minimum, if abortion drugs are to be dispensed via telemedicine, we assume many givens. First, a live clinician interface (or at a bare minimum, review of a patient’s clinical information by a qualified medical professional before the drugs are dispensed).  Second, confirmation via ID of patient identity and age. Finally, appropriate screening for potentially life-threatening contraindications, accurate knowledge of the patient’s last menstrual period with gestational age confirmed and counseling provided specific to her situation. All of these assumptions are crucial to minimize the risk of harm to women.

These assumptions align with guidance regarding abortion drug use from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), which recommends confirmation of “pregnancy and estimate gestational age,” “discussion of when patients should contact their clinician in the case of heavy bleeding” and counseling “in the event of an unsuccessful medication abortion.”

These are life or death assumptions—always for one of my patients and sometimes for both. Recognizing this, an investigation has been launched into the companies that produce these drugs, and a bill has been introduced to protect women from them as well. 

Abortion pill providers specifically state that a medical professional will look at any patient’s information before the patient is given a prescription.

To test this theory, I recently visited a “Plan C” website to confirm that ACOG’s guidelines and the site’s own promise were employed while accessing abortion drugs via “telemedicine.”

In my request, I claimed to be a 13-year-old with an IUD in place who was on blood thinning medications, suffered from anemia, had undergone three previous C-sections, and had a prior history of ectopic pregnancy. 

This was a purposefully ridiculous combination of conditions, any one of which should have set off warning flags. Despite the life-threatening risks of taking mifepristone with these conditions, I received an email requesting payment and confirmation of my address for the pills to be shipped within two minutes of submitting the form. This was despite the fact that the website promised I would not receive this until a healthcare professional had reviewed all of my information. 

The screening required no steps to verify if I was even ordering the pills for myself and no basic identification of any kind. I was allowed to continue after merely acknowledging I’d read the associated warnings, and the website also let me change my answers and proceed immediately to order after I received warnings on different responses. 

At the end of the process, I was asked to sign a patient agreement acknowledging I was aware of potential side effects that hadn’t been mentioned previously, including the risk of infection and to check a box saying I’d discussed them with my medical provider. 

Throughout the process, I hadn’t talked to anyone, much less a physician I could contact if something went wrong. Furthermore, the website didn’t require a doctor’s note or even the name of my physician. 

It was as if the FDA and ACOG’s safety guidelines suddenly stopped applying once abortion pills were available online.

Patients deserve better. 

Permitting an anonymous person to run a website with no liability for distributing these drugs to someone they clearly shouldn’t is not just negligent—it’s criminal.

All due diligence falls on the girl or woman who assumes that institutions like the FDA, ACOG and the World Health Organization are promoting safe, accessible care. Normally this due diligence is provided by a physician who is there to have thorough discussions with patients about their individual risks, answering questions and providing ongoing care. Removing physicians and safety protocols from the equation is a far cry from healthcare in any sense.

Women and girls across all 50 states in difficult circumstances aren’t getting healthcare through telemedicine. All they’re getting is a bill. 

We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal.

Hyde Amendment Absent from Trump Health Plan, but White House Promises ‘Strongest Possible Pro-Life Protections’

EXCLUSIVE: Trump Moves to Claw Back Taxpayer Funds for Immigrant Children’s Abortions

Ohio’s Abortion Amendment Used to Block Fetal Remains Law

Read the first chapter of The Woketopus right now for FREE

Today, even with President Trump’s victory, leftist elites have their tentacles in every aspect of our government.

The Daily Signal’s own Tyler O’Neil exposes this leftist cabal in his new book, The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government.

In this book, O’Neil reveals how the Left’s NGO apparatus pursues its woke agenda, maneuvering like an octopus by circumventing Congress and entrenching its interests in the federal government.

You can read the first chapter of this new book for FREE in this eBook, The Woketopus: Chapter One using the secure link below.

The Tony Kinnett Cast

The Daily Signal Podcast

© 2025 The Daily Signal Media Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

We use cookies on our website. By using our website, you consent to cookies.  Learn More .  

© The Daily Signal