Physical strength develops through the perseverance of training, and strength of character is demonstrated by adhering to and applying integrity—the universal moral and ethical principle of doing no harm. Neither one of these is easy. Both require self‑initiated discipline, dedication, determination, perseverance, and resilience to develop and advance self‑empowerment potential, which is understood as the individual’s inherent capacity for autonomy and agency. Yet even with such effort, self-empowerment is not guaranteed, as this is only realised through consistent action rather than stated intention.

At the centre of both physical training and intrinsic moral development is a single reflective question, as presented in Responsibility Theory®: “What am I responsible for, and what power do I have?” This question immediately directs attention to the self, and it demands a universal answer which is: “I am responsible for, and I’ve got the power over what I think, do, say, learn, and choose.”

This answer now immediately prompts another question, which is: “Is this answer universally true?” This question now leads to a deeper analysis that is advanced with the following two questions: (1) Does anything of what has been written and presented, thus far, possess personal or social veracity? And (2) Does any of what has been written align with the principle of universal application?

If the answers to all of these questions cannot withstand universal scrutiny, i.e., if what has been written cannot be applied to all, should all of this then be dismissed and forgotten altogether? To examine this issue from a universal perspective, we turn to Aristotle and Sartre.

Aristotle held that virtue – integrity – is formed and displayed through every moral choice and action. Character is not hidden; it is revealed in conduct. Virtue is not an abstract ideal but a lived practice, shaped through repetition and........

© Psychology Today