menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Is the Better Strategy Win-Win or Win-Lose?

73 0
10.05.2026

Management coaches often promote win-win strategies, but lose-win managing seems to be more common.

If your skills are limited, you can win by diminishing your competitor.

Win-lose bullying works in the real world if you can oppress your competitor, thereby raising your own status.

Business, leadership and management advisors and coaches often talk about “Win-Win” strategies. Such approaches would (in theory) result in someone getting what they want while also enabling their competitor to “win” with something they want. This is a fundamental tenet of negotiation. It also has the benefit of being morally virtuous in the sense that everyone gains something. Sayings that embody that concept include “A rising tide lifts all boats” and “Trickle-down economics.”

Win-win certainly sounds good, but it only can work when the proponent has the ability to actually advance themselves by creating or gaining ground in whatever field or endeavor they are engaged with.

Win-Lose With an Attitude

The opposite of Win-Win can occur when someone doesn’t have the necessary skills or capabilities for self-advancement. In that type of situation, they can promote themselves by diminishing their competition. This is the basis for “Win-Lose” strategies, although the term is generally not used because “I do something to make you lose so I can win” does not convey social or moral virtue.

However, in some circumstances – such as sports – this can be viewed as trying to win with a good defense. That strategy can be particularly effective in a sport like American football in which the defense can actually score points. (In contrast, a baseball team “on the field” cannot score any runs; they can only prevent runs........

© Psychology Today