In Book X of Plato's Republic, we encounter a soul who has lived virtuously in heaven but immediately chooses the life of a tyrant when given unlimited options. Plato's explanation is direct: This soul had "participated in virtue by habit and not by philosophy" (619c-d). External circumstances made vice difficult, but the soul never developed true internal governance.

The Myth of Er isn't really about reincarnation. It's Plato's way of asking: When you face genuine choices in your actual life, what guides your decisions? If external constraints disappeared tomorrow, would you have internal principles sufficient to navigate freedom wisely?

This pattern appears constantly in contemporary life. The lottery winner who loses everything within five years. The child actor struggling with addiction in their 20s. The young athlete whose sudden wealth and fame lead to personal destruction. Each case illustrates the same ancient truth: External success without internal development creates serious problems.

Consider the typical lottery winner narrative. Before winning, many live moderately, pay bills on time, and maintain relationships responsibly. We might assume they possess solid character. But Plato would ask: Are they virtuous, or are limited resources simply constraining excess?

When the jackpot removes all external constraints, the answer becomes clear. Without developed self-governance, the survival system (what Plato called........

© Psychology Today