menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

How Elon Musk Would Have Run OpenAI Differently, According to Sam Altman

5 0
wednesday

Business Finance Media Technology Policy Wealth Insights Interviews

Art Art Fairs Art Market Art Reviews Auctions Galleries Museums Interviews

Lifestyle Nightlife & Dining Style Travel Interviews

Power Lists Nightlife & Dining Art A.I. PR

About About Observer Advertise With Us Reprints

How Elon Musk Would Have Run OpenAI Differently, According to Sam Altman

New testimony from Sam Altman suggests Musk’s vision for OpenAI may have centered on ownership and scale, not nonprofit ideals.

On the heels of Sam Altman’s testimony in the ongoing trial over Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI, a clearer picture is emerging of how Musk might have run the company differently. Musk, a co-founder of OpenAI as a nonprofit, is suing the company, its CEO Altman and president Greg Brockman for “stealing a charity.” He is seeking to have the now $852 billion A.I. company return to its original nonprofit structure and is also pursuing up to $180 billion in damages to be transferred from OpenAI’s for-profit arm to its nonprofit parent.

Sign Up For Our Daily Newsletter

Thank you for signing up!

By clicking submit, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge we may use your information to send you emails, product samples, and promotions on this website and other properties. You can opt out anytime.

Taking the........

© Observer