menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Supreme Court didn’t end the birthright-citizen battle — it just made it harder to resolve

11 0
30.06.2026

US News Metro Long Island Politics

Sports NFL MLB Olympics NBA NHL College Football College Basketball WNBA

Entertainment TV Movies Music Celebrities Awards Theater

Lifestyle Weird But True Sex & Relationships Viral Trends Human Interest Parenting Fashion & Beauty Food & Drink Travel

Health Wellness Fitness Health Care Medicine Men’s Health Women’s Health Mental Health Nutrition

Science Space Environment Wildlife Archaeology

Today’s Paper Covers Columnists Horoscopes Crosswords & Games Sports Odds Podcasts Careers

Email Newsletters Official Store Home Delivery Tips

Switch between CA and NY editions here.

Supreme Court didn’t end the birthright-citizen battle — it just made it harder to resolve

See more of our coverage in your search results.

When President Donald Trump’s birthright-citizenship order reached the Supreme Court, the smart money said it would lose.

The question was whether the justices would take the narrow path Justice Brett Kavanaugh ultimately mapped out in his partial dissent, or constitutionalize the whole issue.

They chose the latter.

In Trump v. Barbara, a five-justice majority held that the 14th Amendment itself guarantees citizenship to children born here to parents here illegally or only temporarily.

That result will be hailed as a vindication of the post-Civil War promise of equal citizenship.

But the opinion is more sweeping than it needed to be — and, on the originalist question, less inevitable than its defenders pretend.

Hunter Biden-style sleaze is just as slimy when the Trump boys do it

The Daughters of the American Revolution are in revolt — because trans zealots can’t leave ANYTHING alone

Mamdani’s rent-freeze win could come back to bite him — at the Supreme Court

For once, I agree with Kavanaugh’s middle-of-the-road approach.

He would’ve invalidated Trump’s order because it conflicts with a 1940 federal law that was eventually folded into the Immigration and Nationality Act.

That would’ve been a perfectly respectable way to say, “Mr. President, you can’t do this on your own. If the elected branches want to revisit these rules,........

© New York Post