Trump’s Supreme Court appeal targets #MeToo injustice that’s warping our courts
US News Metro Long Island Politics
Sports NFL MLB Olympics NBA NHL College Football College Basketball WNBA
Entertainment TV Movies Music Celebrities Awards Theater
Lifestyle Weird But True Sex & Relationships Viral Trends Human Interest Parenting Fashion & Beauty Food & Drink Travel
Health Wellness Fitness Health Care Medicine Men’s Health Women’s Health Mental Health Nutrition
Science Space Environment Wildlife Archaeology
Today’s Paper Covers Columnists Horoscopes Crosswords & Games Sports Odds Podcasts Careers
Email Newsletters Official Store Home Delivery Tips
Switch between CA and NY editions here.
Trump’s Supreme Court appeal targets #MeToo injustice that’s warping our courts
See more of our coverage in your search results.
When the accusation is sexual assault or rape, the rights of the accused go out the window.
President Donald Trump knows that firsthand — and he’s asking the US Supreme Court to remedy it.
Prosecutors and plaintiffs’ lawyers can drag in character assassins who know nothing about the alleged assault, but instead make their own claims — without proof — that they too were victims of the accused, often years or even decades earlier.
That’s what happened to Trump in the E. Jean Carroll case, and why he’s appealing the jury’s decision.
Last week, the justices delayed for the 11th time answering whether they will take up E. Jean Carroll v. Trump.
A New York jury awarded Carroll $5 million in 2023 after finding Trump liable for sexually abusing her in a Bergdorf Goodman’s lingerie dressing room years earlier.
More From Betsy McCaughey
Hantavirus cruise outbreak sounds a dire warning for a mobile world
Supreme Court puts Big Brother on trial — and your privacy on the line
Mamdani’s ‘bonkers’ DEI scheme is divisive — and could be deadly
Court watchers speculate the justices are delaying until a companion case, also involving Trump and Carroll, weaves its way up to them.
Whatever the reason, it’s crucial for the court to strike down the jury’s verdict — and halt this egregiously unfair character-assassination........
