Top U.S. Military Officer Shatters Trump’s Biggest Claims on Iran War

Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Dan Caine refused to defend President Trump’s recent statements on the war.

Not even the highest-ranking military officer in the U.S. can confidently support President Trump’s claims that the joint U.S.-Israeli war on Iran is over, let alone that the United States is winning.

Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Dan Caine and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth were questioned about their half a trillion dollar funding request for the Iran war at a Senate Appropriations hearing on Tuesday, two weeks after Trump told Congress that the conflict was “terminated.”

“General Caine, the president has claimed on several occasions over the past couple of months that the war is over, the conflict has been concluded. What were the goals of the U.S. conflict in Iran, and have we achieved them?” Senator Dick Durbin asked.

The general couldn’t offer a straight answer.

“Well, sir, I’m gonna be mindful of my need to maintain trust with a variety of stakeholders in the job that I’m in, which includes you, the American people, the Joint Force, and the president.… Only our political and civilian leaders set the national military objectives,” Caine replied, refusing to answer the question directly. “I’ll defer to the secretary and the president on other strategic objectives, but that’s what we’ve been focused on, sir.”

Durbin: "The president has claimed on several occasions over the last few months that the war is over, that the conflict has been concluded. What were the goals of the U.S. conflict in Iran and have we achieved them?"Gen. Caine: "I'll defer to the secretary and the president." pic.twitter.com/9dzVLnJjNW— The Bulwark (@BulwarkOnline) May 12, 2026

Durbin: "The president has claimed on several occasions over the last few months that the war is over, that the conflict has been concluded. What were the goals of the U.S. conflict in Iran and have we achieved them?"Gen. Caine: "I'll defer to the secretary and the president." pic.twitter.com/9dzVLnJjNW

“Do you feel that the situation in the Strait of Hormuz indicates a victory on our side?” Durbin continued.

Caine once again deferred to the president, refusing to call upon his years of military expertise to give a simple judgment call on a question the entire world knows the answer to.

“Sir, only political leaders decide victory or defeat, and I’ll leave it to them to opine on that. They are the ones who invoke or stop the use of military force.”

“Well, let me put it in strictly military terms,” Durbin said. “Can you explain to the American people, who are facing these gasoline and diesel oil prices, what is going on in the Strait of Hormuz, where Iran—which was attacked by us—seemingly has the Strait of Hormuz at a standstill, with 1,500 tankers waiting for either permission or peaceful circumstances to navigate?”

“Militarily, it’s a case where Iran is choosing to hold the world’s economy hostage through their use of military power across their southern flank,” Caine replied. “And so I would encourage Iran to reconsider that. And I would encourage those allies and partners who have an opportunity to come assist with that tactical problem to do so.”

That answer certainly does not indicate victory.

Durbin: "Do you feel that the situation in the Strait of Hormuz indicates a victory?"Gen. Caine: "Only political leaders decide victory or defeat. I'll leave it to them to opine on that…It's a case where Iran is choosing to hold the world's economy hostage." pic.twitter.com/EoI5hefx8l— The Bulwark (@BulwarkOnline) May 12, 2026

Durbin: "Do you feel that the situation in the Strait of Hormuz indicates a victory?"Gen. Caine: "Only political leaders decide victory or defeat. I'll leave it to them to opine on that…It's a case where Iran is choosing to hold the world's economy hostage." pic.twitter.com/EoI5hefx8l

Ex–FBI Agent Confirms What We All Suspected About Kash Patel’s Purges

Former acting FBI Chief Brian Driscoll revealed Kash Patel is significantly focused on helping Donald Trump.

The FBI is conducting loyalty tests to determine who belongs in the bureau’s rank and file, according to the last FBI chief.

Brian Driscoll was a decorated FBI agent with 18 years at the agency under his belt before he was offered the bureau’s number two job at the beginning of Donald Trump’s second term. A clerical error would ultimately place Driscoll at the top of the agency, making him the bureau’s acting director—an oversight that wasn’t corrected until the Senate confirmed Kash Patel at the end of February.

Driscoll wasn’t keen to take the reins of the FBI but told CNN Tuesday that he agreed to take the job after he was informed it was between him and a political appointee.

Yet as the weeks bore on, the questions he fielded from incoming Trump officials began to concern him. They inquired about his political affiliations, who he voted for, when he began supporting Trump, and if he supported a Democrat in recent elections.

Patel was more blunt. The onboarding wouldn’t be an issue so long as Driscoll wasn’t active on social media, didn’t donate to the Democratic Party, and didn’t vote for Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 election, Driscoll recalled Patel saying.

“It made the hair on the back of my neck stand up,” Driscoll told CNN.

Driscoll met with Patel after the latter had been confirmed. Patel flatly said that “the FBI tried to put the president in jail and he hasn’t forgotten it,” Driscoll recalled.

The issue came to a head two weeks after Trump’s inauguration. When the White House demanded the names of some 6,000 bureau staff who were involved in the January 6 probe, Driscoll refused, sparking accusations from then–Justice Department official Emil Bove that there was “insubordination” among the FBI’s leadership.

Driscoll said that when he confronted Bove about the need for a list, Bove blamed it on “cultural rot in the FBI.”

“I was telling them this is wrong,” Driscoll told CNN.

Driscoll was fired........

© New Republic