Nearly seven months after President Mahmoud Abbas formed the constitutional drafting committee, the president moved a few days ago to release the draft “Interim Constitution of the State of Palestine” to the public and to relevant institutions for review and comment over a 60-day period. The designated committee is expected to receive, compile, and examine these submissions, then produce an initial report within two months. This would be followed by a detailed assessment of the findings and a set of recommendations, paving the way for a final version of the constitutional draft before it is put to a popular referendum. The question, however, remains unresolved: does this step amount to a genuine initiative to establish a constitution for the State of Palestine, or is it largely a response to a particularly complex political moment, much as in previous phases? More pointedly, does the new draft offer credible solutions to a political and constitutional crisis that has defied resolution for years, and that would justify its emergence at this juncture?

Several months ago, President Mahmoud Abbas unveiled, through a presidential decree, an ambitious plan for institutional transformation, framed as preparation for a transition from authority to statehood. The plan calls for the drafting of an interim constitution by October of this year, followed by elections to the Palestinian National Council the following month. On more than one occasion, the president has also reiterated his commitment to holding comprehensive presidential and parliamentary elections within a single year once the war on Gaza comes to an end. In his address to the United Nations last year, Abbas explicitly linked the mandate given to the interim constitutional drafting committee to what he described as “part of the reform effort.” This comes amid sustained calls from numerous countries urging the Palestinians to undertake political reforms across their institutions, including the Palestine Liberation Organisation itself. These developments also coincide with a significant wave of recognitions of the State of Palestine by Western countries, following the crimes committed by the occupation authorities in Gaza during the latest war, as well as the unprecedented pressure exerted by those authorities in the West Bank. Together, these factors have placed additional strain on an already complex Palestinian political landscape. The Palestinian experience with adopting the Basic Law, amending it in 2003 and 2005, and reviving the constitutional committee in 2011 all point to a recurring pattern: such decisions have consistently been shaped, if not driven, by prevailing political considerations.

The Palestinian Legislative Council adopted the Basic Law in 1997, designating it as an interim constitution for the Palestinian Authority. Under the Oslo Accords, the transitional period was set at five years, after which final-status issues were to be resolved, an arrangement that was supposed to conclude in 1999. President Yasser Arafat did not ratify the Basic Law at the time. Instead, he moved in 1999 to establish a committee tasked with drafting a constitution for a future Palestinian state, headed by Nabil Shaath. It was not until 2002 that Arafat approved the Interim Palestinian Basic Law, three years after the occupation government had refused to bring the transitional phase to an end as stipulated in the agreements for 1999. This decision also coincided with major political developments on the ground in the Palestinian territories, following the outbreak of the Al-Aqsa Intifada and the sweeping Israeli policies that accompanied it, including military incursions, targeted killings, and a systematic effort to undermine, contain, and erode the standing of the Palestinian Authority.

WATCH: ‘Common enemy’: the Epstein class behind Oslo’s failure | Palestine This Week with Mouin Rabbani

In April 2003, a Road Map was released that explicitly tied political progress in the Palestinian territories to the reform of Palestinian Authority institutions and the construction of effective governance structures. That same year, far-reaching amendments were introduced to the Palestinian Basic Law, altering the very nature of the political system by creating the post of prime minister for the first time. These changes were accompanied by new constitutional arrangements designed to delineate the respective powers of the president and the newly established prime minister. The 2003........

© Middle East Monitor