The Marketing Metrics Leaders Ignore—Until They Have to Pay for Them

The signals leaders overlook at the top of the funnel are often the ones that determine long‑term demand.

EXPERT OPINION BY NICOLE RAMIREZ, FOUNDER, NR DIGITAL CONSULTING

Illustration: Getty Images

The problem with “vanity metrics” isn’t just that they’re misunderstood. It’s that the label itself may be costing companies millions.

The term has been used to describe social media performance indicators like likes, comments, reach, and engagement. Signals are often dismissed as superficial or non-essential. But what if that framing didn’t just mislabel the data? What if it quietly downgraded an entire function inside organizations?

Robyn Nissim has been challenging that assumption long before most companies took social seriously. She helped launch brand channels for companies like Michelin and Nissan, built Ulta Beauty’s influencer marketing program from the ground up, scaled Anastasia Beverly Hills to 24 million followers, and helped drive measurable revenue through organic social at Alo Yoga.

She started questioning the term the moment she found herself sitting across from paid media teams. They could speak fluently about revenue, return, and efficiency. Their metrics mapped cleanly to business outcomes. 

How Anthropic's Claude AI Became a Co-Founder

“My entire toolset was limited to the metrics available inside the social platforms themselves—likes, comments, reach, engagement,” she explains.

In Nissim’s view, it wasn’t that social lacked impact. It lacked a way to explain its impact in the language leadership trusted, and over time, that gap created a hierarchy of value inside organizations.

When language shapes strategy

When engagement is labeled “vanity,” it diminishes the function of the metrics.

© Inc.com