Thoughtful judgement in the age of outrage
In an age of instant information, hot takes, and algorithmically fuelled outrage, the premium on speed has overtaken the premium on thought. Today, business leaders, investors, and policy makers are expected to have views on everything — from geopolitical conflicts to corporate governance scandals — often within hours, if not minutes. But we must ask ourselves: Are we responding with insight, or simply reacting with emotion? Are we contributing clarity — or adding to the noise?
As public trust shifts from institutions to individuals, the burden on leaders to offer opinions grows. However, opinion alone does not equate to leadership. An ill-informed or prematurely expressed view — especially in complex or emotionally charged contexts — can do real harm to credibility, policy outcomes, investor confidence, and social cohesion.
Every responsible leader must periodically ask if they understand this issue deeply enough to speak with conviction, if they can articulate both the position for and against the argument they are leaning toward, and whether they are relying on verified data or on headlines and emotion. If the answer to any of these is “no,” then silence isn’t a weakness — it is strategic maturity. Great leadership, especially in volatile environments,........
© hindustantimes
 visit website
 visit website        




















 login
login who are we?
who are we? contact us
contact us qosheapp
qosheapp

 Toi Staff
Toi Staff Gideon Levy
Gideon Levy Tarik Cyril Amar
Tarik Cyril Amar Stefano Lusa
Stefano Lusa Mort Laitner
Mort Laitner Mark Travers Ph.d
Mark Travers Ph.d Ellen Ginsberg Simon
Ellen Ginsberg Simon Andrew Silow-Carroll
Andrew Silow-Carroll


 
                                                            
 
         
 