Defining the new man
Setting: A dimly lit, smoke-clad room in Paris, circa 1960. Beyond the glass, the world is in the tremors of decolonization. Two men sit across the table. Ali Shariati, the “Sociologist of Islam,” lean & intense, and Frantz Fanon, the psychiatrist of the “Wretched of the Earth,” weary but burning with a cold, analytical fire.
Shariati: Frantz, you conceptualize a “new man” evolving from the ashes of colonial violence. You speak of the psychological rupture required to break the albatross of the European “Other.” But I ask you: once the skin breaks out from the binary of black or white, what fills the void in the soul? If you strip the Algerian or the Iranian of his cosmo- symbolic orientation—his faith—do you not leave him a hollow bowl, easily refilled by the very consumerist, secular decadence of the West you despise? If we do not sketch out a “Return to the Self” that is rooted in our own spiritual historicity, we are merely swapping one form of alienation for another.
Fanon: (Puffing out a cloud of smoke) Ali, you mistake a diagnostic observation for a spiritual longing. The “void” you fear is, in fact, the space of freedom—the “Zone of Non- Being” finally reclaiming its resonance. Religion, in the colonial discourse, has been the most potent anesthetic ever administered to the colonized. It is the “promised land” that justifies the current hell. When the colonizer tells the native to “turn the other cheek,” he is not teaching morality; he is ensuring the native’s neck remains exposed to the blade. To place the sacred back into the revolutionary paradigm is to re-invite the very hierarchy and fatalism that kept us in chains for centuries. You want to save the soul, but I am trying to save the body from the psychosis of subhumanity.
Shariati: But you are looking at the religion of legitimation—the “Islam of the Palace,” of the Caliphs and the Shahs who use God as a theological disciplinarian, the heavenly panopticon. I speak of the religion of protest. Look at the history of the prophets! They weren’t the guardians of the temples, but the........
