India’s response to the Pahalgam terrorist attack was carefully calibrated, measured, precisely targeted and intended to not escalate or spin out. The main objective that was achieved was the establishment of a new doctrine: that terrorist attacks by any Pakistan-based actors would now be treated as an act of war.

This doctrine seems to have received tacit approval from the global community, since India did not receive any censure for its military strikes at multiple sites within Pakistan. What happened after the bombing of those nine sites could not have been fully anticipated.

Would the military establishment in Pakistan use this excuse to touch the “hair trigger” and go nuclear? Would it resort to an irrational and disproportionate response since its conventional counterattack did not work? And who would win the war of narratives? All of this got lost in the rapidly developing “fog of war”, although this conflict cannot really be called a full-scale war by any means.

The “fog of war” was made foggier by much of the media, especially social media. Some media even reported preposterous developments without fact-checking or veri-fication. Social media is indeed like a tiger that policy makers and military strategists must reluctantly ride. It is impossible to control this tiger.

But the halt of hostilities, whether due to behind-the-scenes third-party intervention or not, is welcome. It has ended in four days, and India’s objective of laying down a new doctrine has been achieved. Other collateral success has been the quality of briefings by the military spokespersons, including women.

These........

© Free Press Journal