menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Rob Breakenridge: Straightforward process becomes politicized to boost rural ridings Given the UCP strength in rural Alberta and the competitiveness within urban centres, the political motivation behind such a change seems rather obvious

26 0
21.04.2026

Share this Story : Edmonton Journal Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

Rob Breakenridge: Straightforward process becomes politicized to boost rural ridings

Given the UCP strength in rural Alberta and the competitiveness within urban centres, the political motivation behind such a change seems rather obvious

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

Five years ago, an Elections Canada report called for a redistribution of seats in the House of Commons, which resulted in three new seats for Alberta.

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Exclusive articles by David Staples, Keith Gerein and others, Oilers news from Cult of Hockey, Ask EJ Anything features, the Noon News Roundup and Under the Dome newsletters.

Unlimited online access to Edmonton Journal and 15 news sites with one account.

Edmonton Journal ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.

Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.

Support local journalism.

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Exclusive articles by David Staples, Keith Gerein and others, Oilers news from Cult of Hockey, Ask EJ Anything features, the Noon News Roundup and Under the Dome newsletters.

Unlimited online access to Edmonton Journal and 15 news sites with one account.

Edmonton Journal ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.

Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.

Support local journalism.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account.

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.

Enjoy additional articles per month.

Get email updates from your favourite authors.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments

Enjoy additional articles per month

Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

Arguably, if left to former prime minister Justin Trudeau’s government, such a change would not have occurred. But political self-interest should never be a guiding principle in designing electoral boundaries.

As it happens, Parliament eventually passed a law ensuring that provinces will never have fewer seats than they did in the 43rd Parliament (December 2019 to August 2021). That change ensured that Elections Canada’s recommendation of one fewer seat for Quebec was a non-starter.

Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.

There was an error, please provide a valid email address.

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Headline News will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.

Perhaps politics can never fully be removed.

Here in Alberta, however, these principles are being put to the test. The government’s response to the latest recommendations for Alberta’s electoral map risks setting a troubling new precedent.

For the first time, an Alberta government is rejecting the electoral boundaries report delivered by an independent commission. Instead, the UCP government is proposing a new government-controlled committee to draw up a new map.

This is ostensibly a result of differing opinions and recommendations from those on the committee. It appears, though, that some of this disagreement was orchestrated.

To be clear, there is a report from the commission’s majority. But for the first time, there is a different electoral map put forth by the two UCP appointees on the commission. Their proposed map would merge more than a dozen urban and rural ridings.

Given the UCP strength in rural Alberta and the competitiveness within urban centres, the political motivation behind such a change seems rather obvious.

Alberta to redraw electoral map, expand legislature to 91 seats in fast-tracked review

Alberta premier defends electoral map redraw plan amid backlash

Advertisement 1Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let template=document.getElementById(`oop-ad-template`);if(template&&!template.dataset.adInjected){let clone=template.content.cloneNode(!0);template.replaceWith(clone),template.parentElement&&(template.parentElement.dataset.adInjected=`true`)}});

Premier Danielle Smith insists that her government isn’t accepting the minority report and that her motivation is to redress the loss of two rural ridings in the majority’s proposed map. That means instead of 89 ridings, we’ll end up with 91.

It is true that the chair of the commission, Court of King’s Bench Justice Dallas Miller, suggested that if MLAs disagree with the removal of the two seats, they could reinstate them and add two more ridings. His caveat, though, was that the majority’s proposed map “must be maintained to the extent possible.”

We obviously don’t know what the government’s final map is going to look like after we go through this new process. And as committee member Greg Clark noted, “what we can’t do is simply drop two new seats onto an existing map.”

Blue collar heroes save day for sloppy Edmonton Oilers in Game 1 Edmonton Oilers

Blue collar heroes save day for sloppy Edmonton Oilers in Game 1

Player grades: Edmonton Oilers goal rush too much for Ducks in 4-3 win Cult of Hockey

Player grades: Edmonton Oilers goal rush too much for Ducks in 4-3 win

Advertisement 2Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let template=document.getElementById(`oop-ad-template`);if(template&&!template.dataset.adInjected){let clone=template.content.cloneNode(!0);template.replaceWith(clone),template.parentElement&&(template.parentElement.dataset.adInjected=`true`)}});

Lowe: 'Bullish' on Oilers to make another long Cup run Local News

Lowe: 'Bullish' on Oilers to make another long Cup run

Subscriber only. Why is Edmonton dropping $15 million at Rossdale for the thorny River Crossing project? Subscriber only Local News

Subscriber only. Why is Edmonton dropping $15 million at Rossdale for the thorny River Crossing project?

Oilers notebook: Edmonton defenceman Mattias Ekholm enters 12th straight NHL playoffs NHL

Oilers notebook: Edmonton defenceman Mattias Ekholm enters 12th straight NHL playoffs

There’s an important point here — the commission drew up a map with 89 seats because the government legislated that it should have 89 seats. In late 2024, the government passed the Justice Statutes Amendment Act, which mandated that just two new electoral divisions be added in the next commission review.

Suddenly and conveniently, though, 91 turns out to be an ideal number.

And even though the premier is distancing herself from what is essentially a gerrymandered map, there is still political self-interest in preserving, and thus favouring, rural ridings. If rural populations are declining while urban populations are growing (and growing quite rapidly, as the premier herself frequently points out), that cannot be ignored.

It’s the same reason Alberta deserved more seats in Ottawa, and perhaps deserves even more.

The other problem we face is that Elections Alberta needs at least 18 months to implement any new plan to redraw the electoral map, which (assuming the next election is indeed October 2027) wouldn’t be a problem if the government simply accepted this report. A rushed timeline is going to mean higher costs for Elections Alberta.

We’ve needlessly complicated and politicized what has been — and what should be — a straightforward process.

Hopefully, the government resists the urge to go even further in its tinkering, but that won’t undo the damage that’s been done.

Rob Breakenridge is a Calgary-based podcaster and writer. He can be found at robbreakenridge.ca and reached at rob.breakenridge@gmail.com.

Share this Story : Edmonton Journal Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.


© Edmonton Journal