How one decision could see us shortchanged on billions
The federal budget is under pressure, the global economic outlook is volatile and cost-of-living pressures continue to hammer Australian families.
Login or signup to continue reading
And yet the communications regulator is proposing the federal government adopt a policy that could forgo up to $3.2 billion in revenue.
The approach would also reduce competition among telecommunications providers and hamper the introduction of new technologies.
It all revolves around how the federal government approaches telecommunications spectrum licenses.
Some 69 existing spectrum licenses across seven bands are due to expire between 2028 and 2032, 48 of which are held by three mobile network operators.
Spectrum is a valuable public resource. It must be managed carefully to ensure the proper functioning of commercial, government, military and emergency communications - everything from mobile phones, to radios, to televisions, to satellites, to submarines utilise spectrum to communicate.
It is the job of the regulator, the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), to assign spectrum. However, their approach to this issue is baffling and potentially costly.
ACMA plans to renew expiring mobile spectrum licenses without a competitive auction, a decision that risks forfeiting between $2 billion and $3.2 billion in public revenue over the coming years.
The cost has been estimated in independent economic analysis by Professor Richard Holden, Scientia Professor of Economics at UNSW Business School and editor of the Journal of Law and Economics.
Professor Holden says the failure to hold a competitive auction for spectrum is "based on flawed economic reasoning (and) may significantly undermine public trust, market competition, and the integrity of the regulatory process".
In his independent analysis, commissioned by ACCAN, Professor Holden argues that by granting renewed access to existing telcos without testing the........
© Canberra Times
