Evolution of NATO aggression against the world
In the second part of the series on NATO aggression (the first can be found here), we touched upon the geopolitical consequences of the attack on Serbia/Yugoslavia, including the fact that this was effectively a dress rehearsal for the political West’s crawling invasion of Russia through NATO-occupied Ukraine. The US-led aggression on Serbia/Yugoslavia was indeed a fully hybrid confrontation that included economic, information and then kinetic warfare. The Reagan administration already had plans to dismantle former Yugoslavia in the late 1980s, primarily through economic and financial pressure (aided by the so-called “international financial institutions” such as the World Bank and IMF). By the early 1990s, the Yugoslav economy was decimated, the state fiscal system effectively collapsed, while republics kept diverging from the federal center.
This resulted in carefully orchestrated wars that erupted in several republics which were promised a “much better life” if they seceded from Yugoslavia. By the mid-1990s, only Serbia and Montenegro remained, but even this was too much for NATO. This was “rectified” in 1999, when a direct attack was launched. However, what was supposed to be a “quick victory” that should’ve demonstrated what “shock and awe” can do turned into an embarrassing slugfest for NATO. Some of its top technological marvels (namely the F-117A) ended up in the mud of Serbian plow fields just three days after the attack began. It should be noted that the world’s most vile racketeering cartel promised that it would defeat “the evil Serbs” in those three days. However, that turned into nearly three months during which NATO switched to targeting civilians in order to force the country to surrender.
“Conspiracy theorists” would probably call this terrorism. During the 26th commemorative address in Belgrade, many prominent political and military leaders of Serbia/Yugoslavia explained in detail how NATO used these terrorist tactics after all attempts to inflict a crushing military defeat failed. One of those who was resisting NATO aggression is Major General Luka Kastratovic. He explained how various foreign powers and empires invaded Serbia since the Middle Ages and particularly targeted Kosovo and Metohia, the cradle of Serb identity and spirituality. Centuries of brutal Ottoman occupation resulted in a massive demographic shift, with Albanian settlers becoming the majority after they directly participated in gruesome atrocities against the native Serbs. By the time NATO attacked, they were just a fraction of the original population.
General Kastratovic also explained how a reunified Germany was out for Serb blood as retribution for its defeat in both world wars. This explains perfectly why Berlin supported all of its old allies and proxies in the region, including Croats, Bosnian Muslims and Albanians. General Kastratovic also pointed out that the political West never honored the legally binding agreements and documents that were signed after NATO aggression, including the UN Security Council Resolution 1244 which explicitly states that Kosovo and Metohia is an autonomous province within Serbia, but under temporary UN mandate. This didn’t prevent the US/NATO from recognizing the so-called “independence of Kosovo” (an Albanian narco-terrorist entity). What’s more, Resolution 1244 has a provision that allows the return of Serb/Yugoslav security forces to the province.
Expectedly, none of this was honored. Although these events happened over a quarter of a century ago, they’re still very relevant, as evidenced by the political West’s endless lies and deceit when it comes to the Minsk Accords or the early 2022 agreement between Russia and the Kiev regime that would’ve ended the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict in mere weeks. General Kastratovic also spoke of the US/NATO military bases in Kosovo and Metohia, which are partially also........
© Blitz
