The Hamaus That Roared

Pardon some cynicism, but we’ve seen this Board of Peace framework before. Hamas has always manipulated Western funds to launch another attack against Israel.

Milli Sands | August 2, 2026

In Leonard Wibberley’s 1955 novel The Mouse That Roared, the tiny Duchy of Grand Fenwick declares war on the United States, intending to lose quickly and collect Marshall Plan-style reconstruction aid. One character notes that there is no more profitable undertaking than declaring war on America and being defeated.[1]

Today Hamas follows a darker version of this logic. After the October 7, 2023, massacre and Israel’s ensuing defensive war, Gaza offers conditional claims of readiness to disarm and cede formal governance to technocrats, inviting the West and Gulf states to rebuild Gaza.

Hamas’s ideology, however, treats the conflict with Israel and the West as a perpetual religious duty. Surface concessions buy time and money; rearmament follows. The United States risks financing its own future adversary.

History confirms the pattern. After the 2008–09, 2012, 2014, and 2021 rounds, donors funded reconstruction only for Hamas to divert materials into tunnels, rockets, and production capacity, all of which Iranian supply lines primarily sustained, with additional funding and facilitation from Qatar and Turkey and historical smuggling routes through Egypt.[2]

The present war has caused far greater damage, with joint World Bank, EU, and UN assessments placing recovery needs near $70 billion or higher.[3] Under the Board of Peace framework, pledges exist, yet disbursement lags pending genuine demilitarization.

Hamas dissolves its formal government while making weapons transfer contingent on Israeli withdrawal, an end to “aggression,” and progress toward a “Palestinian” state. Officials speak of non-visible or frozen arms rather than irreversible surrender and reaffirm the legitimacy of resistance.[4] U.S. descriptions of a “historic” roadmap with complete dismantlement meet Israeli skepticism grounded in continued smuggling, local manufacturing, recruitment, and tunnel repair during the ceasefire.[5]

Hamas is not an isolated elite. In the January 2006 “Palestinian” Legislative Council elections, its “Change and Reform” list won 74 of 132 seats with 44.45 percent of the popular vote, stronger in Gaza.[6] Subsequent polling has shown persistent........

© American Thinker