|
Carlos LozadaWashington Post |
Personnel once meant policy; now it means flattery.
Seven governing principles still hang in the newsroom, but now as more reproach than reminder.
The surface is all there is.
But being a “hot” country does not make you a good country. Or a decent one.
Is purging America of immigrants so crucial that in the process you must unmake America itself?
What happens when America First becomes the Americas first?
How did we get here? I don’t want to know.
A recent spate of books highlights the presence of a new category, one well suited to our time: the grievance memoir.
Spanish has become a sanctioned indicator of potential criminality in the United States of America.
The best case against indicting James Comey is the one the president made for firing him.
“107 days” is not merely the duration of Harris’s campaign; it is also her excuse for losing the election.
His death makes it harder to look ahead and glimpse what MAGA will stand for.
The compulsion to zero in on the president keeps us from understanding the era fully, and from glimpsing what it might become.
Whichever books you choose, and however you choose them, may your summer reading be satisfying, and your curating ruthless.
When I was a teenager, a mostly forgotten series of novels taught me U.S. history. How would they read to me now?
Foreign policy by FOMO is not a sustainable strategy.
Even with Republican congressional majorities, Trump favors the flourish of the order over the hassle of lawmaking.
What is our shared culture if not the mix of cultures that make and remake America every day?
A lot hinges on how the president invokes the term, which has a rich political history.
If, according to the president, so many people in the United States are the wrong kind, who makes up the right kind?
Trump wants to change what it means to be American.
Advertisement Supported by Carlos Lozada By Carlos Lozada Opinion Columnist Whenever someone agrees wholeheartedly with something I write, I die a...