Letters Oct. 21: Military housing; school police liasion officers
Re: “New apartments to ease military housing crunch,” Oct. 17.
Only the government could celebrate overspending other people’s money. Acquiring property for military housing is reasonable and necessary — but paying millions above the asking price for a foreclosed building, then hosting a celebration, is outrageous.
This isn’t about meeting housing needs; it’s about reckless spending with no accountability.
The building’s purchase price exceeded both the listed and market value, yet officials justified it as a “requirement” because the facility needed to be vacant.
Meanwhile, similar, newly constructed properties near the base — already occupied by service members — were available for far less. Still, urgency and bureaucratic panic took precedence over fiscal responsibility.
The rush to buy stemmed from a desire to meet NATO spending deadlines, not from genuine necessity.
Instead of managing resources wisely, decision-makers prioritized optics and compliance over prudence. This pattern reflects a deeper dysfunction in government spending: inefficiency disguised as progress.
Ultimately, this episode underscores a painful truth — stupidity in government often costs more than corruption.
Overspending and poor planning not only waste taxpayer money but also erode public trust. What should have been a straightforward investment in military infrastructure turned into a symbol of fiscal irresponsibility.
A celebration was the last thing this decision deserved; consequences were what it truly warranted.
Robin Kelley
Saanich
Re: “New apartments to ease military housing crunch,” Oct. 17.
Excellent to hear the military is buying a few existing apartments for their people.
If 600 people are still on the housing list, they........





















Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Tarik Cyril Amar
Stefano Lusa
Mort Laitner
Sabine Sterk
Robert Sarner
Ellen Ginsberg Simon