menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Seeing Balochistan Too Quickly

42 0
23.03.2026

Listen to this article:

On March 17, 2026, Pakistan announced the deployment of 3,000 Federal Constabulary personnel to Balochistan, citing the need to strengthen peace and stability following recent militant operations. The meeting in Quetta also decided to intensify action against baseless propaganda on social media. The response was familiar: more security forces, tighter information control, no political accommodation. It was, in miniature, the pattern that has defined Balochistan’s relationship with the Pakistani state for decades.

By the time the Jaffar Express was hijacked in March 2025, Balochistan had spent most of Pakistan’s history in unresolved conflict, marked by insurgencies never fully ended or addressed. Violence rose and fell as force temporarily displaced grievances. Enforced disappearances, reported for years by families and local journalists, had become a structural feature of governance. This long record produced little accumulated knowledge beyond the province. Balochistan was noticed episodically, then forgotten again, its history flattened into disconnected security incidents. The result was a failure to treat duration itself as evidence.

Balochistan, Pakistan’s largest and least populated province, is a vast, mineral-rich expanse governed less as a constituency than as a perimeter: secured, administered, extracted from, but rarely accommodated. What is new is how briefly Balochistan is allowed to enter national consciousness, usually through violence, before being reduced again to background noise.

It took the hijacking of the Jaffar Express for the world to notice Balochistan. For decades, the province existed in a peculiar limbo: permanently unstable yet strategically inconvenient, violent yet illegible. Its war endured, largely unseen. Endurance, in the modern media economy, rarely qualifies as news.

The hijacking changed that because it violated an unspoken rule of neglect. Trains are the connective tissue of the state. They move soldiers, workers, families; they pass through imagined national space. When violence interrupts that movement, it announces itself beyond the margins. The insurgency crossed an optical threshold.

What followed was not clarity, but compression. In the weeks surrounding the hijacking, violence across Balochistan was suddenly counted with precision: dozens killed in a day, more than a hundred in forty-eight hours, raids spanning Quetta, Panjgur, Harnai, Mastung, and Gwadar. These figures were reported as escalation. In truth, they marked a condensation of violence long dispersed. What years of killing had failed to register now arrived as a burst of legibility, mistaken for novelty.

Nearly a year later, when the Baloch Liberation Army announced Operation Herof, Phase Two in January 2026, the province returned to the news. Herof, a Balochi word for black storm, was a claim of presence: synchronised strikes across districts, prolonged engagements, a deliberate insistence on being seen. Attention would arrive through the blunt punctuation of........

© The Wire