Zachor in Real Time
The 8:10 AM siren that sounded across Jerusalem this past Shabbat broke the morning with its familiar urgency. A few moments later, the muted thuds of interception arrived, signaling that the defense systems overhead had done their work. No ambulances followed. No smoke rose. The city exhaled.
Sirens are never welcome, but their timing sometimes lands with unexpected emotional weight. This one came a few days before Purim, on the day when we read the additional Torah portion commanding us to remember what Amalek did to the Israelites on their journey from Egypt. That passage, Parashat Zachor, is brief, but it carries centuries of resonance: a reminder of vulnerability, of cruelty directed at the weary, and of the moral responsibility to remember.
This year, that message collides with another moment of historic consequence: the confirmed death of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. I am not celebrating his death. But I cannot ignore the emotional and moral reverberations of hearing this news in the same week we read Zachor, especially given his role in my own life’s story.
The Torah describes Amalek attacking the Israelites from behind, striking the stragglers—the tired, the weak, the ones who could not keep pace. The commandment to remember is not about vengeance; it is about moral clarity. It insists that a community must never forget what it feels like to be unprotected, and must never abandon those who lag behind. That ancient image felt painfully contemporary as the siren sounded. Even when danger is intercepted before it reaches us, the emotional memory of vulnerability remains close to the surface.
For me, Zachor has always carried a personal dimension. In 1997, I filed Flatow v. Islamic Republic of Iran, naming the regime—and Khamenei himself—as defendants for their role in the attack that killed my daughter Alisa. She was napping on a bus when the bomber struck. In the Torah’s language, she was among “the tired and the weary,” those who were not in a position to defend themselves. Just days after hearing Zachor in March 1998, I received a significant civil judgment in that case.
And now, almost 30 years afterward, comes the news that Khamenei is dead. I take no satisfaction in the death of any human being. But the convergence of these events—the Torah reading, the judgment, the siren, and the passing of a man whose regime enabled the murder of my child and thousands of others—brought memory into the present with a force I did not expect.
Purim, which follows Zachor, is a holiday built on the tension between danger and deliverance. The story begins with threat and ends with reversal. Tradition teaches that Haman is descended from Amalek, linking the ancient commandment to the narrative of the Megillah. But Purim’s message is not simply about enemies; it is about transformation. It insists that fear is not the final word. Living through a morning siren just before Purim brings that message into sharp relief. The booms of interception overhead, the quiet that follows, the knowledge that harm was prevented—all of it feels like a modern echo of Purim’s theme: danger acknowledged, resilience affirmed.
As Purim approaches, I find myself holding all these layers together: the siren, the Torah reading, the judgment, the news from Tehran, the memories of Alisa, and the resilience of a community that continues to steady itself between alarms.
