In the Arab world, some policies are managed with the attention span of a coffee break and a short institutional memory. Crises erupt, are hastily extinguished, and their root causes are quietly replanted, ready to bloom again tomorrow. The cycle has become ritual: temporary calm, collective amnesia, then the inevitable reproduction of the same error. What emerges is not governance but managed decline, a parallel attrition of political capital and economic stability dressed up as statecraft.

Whenever the Gulf states are presented as a functioning model, a familiar chorus rises from certain Arab intellectual and political circles. We hear the tired refrains about “states without history,” “superficial cultures,” or “rootless modern entities.” This is not analysis; it is defensive diminishment, an attempt to disqualify a success story that refuses to fit the old templates. The problem is not the Gulf. It is the broken metric being used to measure it.

The issue is not having a deep history, but the chronic inability to convert that history into state capacity, into stable institutions, functional economies, and accountable governance. This incapacity is perpetually recycled behind the shield of antiquity, used to postpone questions of competence and results. First before their own people, and second before the world, these elites offer excuses where they should offer progress.

They treat history and culture as symbolic property, not productive capacity. For them, heritage is something that was, not something that builds. Culture is what is declaimed from a podium, not what translates into........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)