or How the new-Palestinians learnt to Gaslight Jews on Everything.

On the 11th of March 2004 at 07:37 a.m. Osama bin Laden’s terrorist network exploded ten bombs on four Madrid bound commuter trains murdering 193 people (including Spaniards and people from sixteen other nations). The coordinated terrorist attacks seriously injured some 2,500 people. Osama bin-Laden immediately took direct responsibility for the attacks. Each bomb that was used held no less than ten kilograms of dynamite and about 700 grams of shrapnel. It was meant to be a mass casualty event which, if it did not kill, would permanently damage the greatest number of human beings. It led directly to the defeat of the incumbent Peoples Party and the successful rise to power of the Socialists Workers party.

Acting on behalf of al Qaeda, bin Laden instructed ‘Europe’ to return Al-Andalus (those sections of Spain and Portugal governed by Muslims between 711 and 1492 CE), also known as the Iberian Peninsula, to Islamic ownership, if, that is, Europeans wanted to ‘immunize’ their nations against ‘Islamic anger.’ As continuation of a five-hundred-year-old historical grievance it was breathtakingly hypocritical. It had never prevented Islam from conquering and enslaving whole races and nations.

What did Osama bin-Laden mean? And is this a universal Muslim theological idea?

According to Islam, no land, previously conquered (or declared to be ‘Islamic inheritance’) may be returned to non-Muslim ownership. To adopt the present-day vernacular – this isn’t just imperialism; this is settler-colonialism taken to an extreme of ever-lasting domination and control. No non-Muslim may exercise either self-determination or anything other than conditional and selective human rights in such lands. This ‘Peace’ has been inevitably and infrequently interrupted by pogrom and slaughter.

According to Islamic theology, as a missionary faith the superiority of the Muslim male is eternal and unconditional. It leads directly into the logic of eliminationism. Structural aspects of human conflict and selective human rights speak falsely of Muslim victimhood and thus places them at the pinnacle of an intersectional hierarchy.

Critical theory makes Islam the most entitled, the most privileged group in Western society and in a material world that posits the idea that “money cures all ills” Western states have failed to demand reciprocity of any kind. No reciprocal tolerance, respect, or love of thy neighbour. Just never-ending hatred, transplanted onto Western soil.

Critical theory in colonial studies has largely gaslit Jewish history. It has succeeded in placing Jews at the bottom of the human rights pyramid. It is the only way the big lie can work. Google the meaning.

It trivialises feelings: dismissing a victim’s emotions as “too sensitive,” “crazy,” or “irrational.”

Blocking or diverting (think cancel culture).

Projection: shifting blame by accusing the victim of the very abusive behaviour they are committing

Gradual implementation: creating a pattern of abuse.

There is a reason that the above, from google, ends with the following statement:

The National Domestic Violence Hotline can Provide Support.

These are the tactics employed in our colonized universities and our colonized public spaces against the Jewish Community.

Systematic denialism is fascism defined. It is structural and routinely abusive behaviour. To systematically replace the objective reality; rewriting Muslim – new-Palestinian history to benefit their narrative of victimhood. This isn’t about a war HAMAS lost and its........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)