Fifty years ago, recruiters needed boots, bars, football terraces, and street corners. Today they need a smartphone.

The shaved heads disappeared but the machinery did not.

Before anyone misunderstands the point, let me make something clear: this is not an argument that pro-Palestinian activism equals neo-Nazi skinheads, nor that criticism of Israel is inherently antisemitic. Millions of people express genuine humanitarian concern for Palestinians and reject antisemitism entirely. That is not the argument.

The argument is that beneath changing slogans, changing aesthetics, and changing political language, the underlying machinery of radicalization may look disturbingly familiar. History rarely repeats itself in identical form. It evolves, adapts, and changes its vocabulary while often preserving the same psychological architecture underneath.

Researchers studying extremism repeatedly identify familiar ingredients in radicalization pathways: alienation, grievance, identity formation, belonging, enemy construction, moral certainty, and eventual escalation. The sequence itself is almost painfully recognizable:

Alienation → Grievance → Identity → Belonging → Enemy → Certainty → Escalation

Young people facing uncertainty, loneliness, social instability, or simply searching for meaning often want the same things human beings have always wanted: purpose, belonging, moral clarity, and an explanation for suffering. The old skinhead pipeline offered exactly that. It offered a simple story: you are under attack, someone is responsible, and joining us gives you identity and purpose.

The enemy changed. The machinery often did not.

What has changed dramatically is the........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)