Why Antizionism Gets a Movement But Antikhomeinism Doesn’t
Among the oddities of modern political morality, few are stranger than this: the only democracy in the Middle East, Israel, is the one whose very existence is denounced, while its most brutal theocracy, the Islamic Republic of Iran, is treated as a legitimate member of the international community. Antizionism thrives; its analog—call it antikhomeinism—barely registers.
The modern and most successful form of antizionism was not born in the Arab world but in Moscow. After Israel’s victory in the Six-Day War of 1967, Soviet “Zionologists”—state-sponsored scholars such as Yuri Ivanov, Lev Korneev and Trofim Kichko—launched a vast propaganda campaign to redefine Zionism as racism and imperialism. Through pseudo-academic tracts like Beware: Zionism! and Judaism Without Embellishment, Zionism was recast as a conspiratorial ideology serving Western colonial interests.
This Soviet campaign—carried into the UN by its client states—culminated in the 1975 resolution declaring that “Zionism is a form of racism.” Since then, antizionism has evolved into a global ideology dedicated not merely to criticizing Israel’s policies but to abolishing the state altogether. Its language of “decolonization” and “resistance” flows directly from that Cold War crucible and now........





















Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Tarik Cyril Amar
Stefano Lusa
Mort Laitner
Sabine Sterk
Ellen Ginsberg Simon
Gilles Touboul
Mark Travers Ph.d