menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

‘Town Planning’ Parashat Mattot-Masaei 5786

27 0
yesterday

There is a moment in Parashat Masaei where the Torah briefly stops telling a story and begins describing structure [Bemidbar 35:2-5]: “Command the children of Israel that they shall give to the Levites from their hereditary possession cities in which to dwell, and you shall give the Levites open spaces around the cities. These cities shall be theirs for dwelling, and their open spaces shall be for their cattle, their property, and for all their needs. The areas of open space for the cities which you shall give to the Levites shall extend from the wall of the city outward, one thousand cubits all around. You shall measure from outside the city, two thousand cubits on the eastern side, two thousand cubits on the southern side, two thousand cubits on the western side, and two thousand cubits on the northern side, with the city in the middle; this shall be your cities’ open spaces.” The Torah lists cities, boundaries, and measured spaces. Forty-eight cities are assigned to the Levites, each one wrapped in a precise geography: a built-up settlement[1] surrounded by a deliberately unbuilt perimeter. At first glance this reads like administrative planning. But the more one looks at it, the more it begins to resemble something deeper, almost an architectural theology.

Each city is a node. Not an expanding metropolis, not a growing organism that slowly absorbs its surroundings, but a discrete unit of settlement. The Torah does not give us one centre that grows outward. It gives us many centres that exist in parallel. The number itself is fixed. Forty-eight. Not as a suggestion, not as a minimum, but as structure. A network of distinct points spread across the land, each one complete in itself.

Around each node lies a second layer. The Torah calls this an “open space (migrash)”. This ring of open space cannot be converted into housing or urban fabric. It is not “unused” land in the modern sense, because it has agricultural and ecological function. But it is unused in a more precise sense: it is not permitted to become part of the city’s expansion. It is a structural........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)