For years, Benjamin Netanyahu was one of the hardest leaders in Ukraine to read.

Not an enemy. Not a friend. Not quite an ally either. More often, he seemed like a politician determined to keep every option open for as long as possible. When Ukraine needed air defense, a clearer political position, and meaningful military backing, Israel chose something else: caution, distance, and a carefully managed “not now.”

That approach was never accidental. It reflected Israel’s long effort to preserve room for maneuver in a region where Russia, Syria, Iran, and Israel’s own security needs were tightly entangled. But 2026 is starting to change that equation.

The years of controlled distance

Kyiv wanted clarity. Jerusalem offered restraint.

From 2022 through 2024, relations between Kyiv and Netanyahu’s government did not collapse. But they did not become genuinely close either.

Ukraine wanted more than sympathy. It wanted air defense systems, stronger political backing, and public recognition that the war against Ukraine was no longer just a local or regional issue. It was part of a broader fight over deterrence, security, and the rules of war in Europe and beyond.

Israel, however, kept its support limited and highly selective. There were humanitarian steps. There were technical measures, including alert systems. There were official contacts. But they remained narrow, cautious, and politically constrained. Even when Kyiv expected moral clarity, Jerusalem preferred ambiguity.

The contrast was especially visible in Netanyahu’s handling of Moscow. His channel to putin never fully disappeared. For years, he maintained regular contact with the Kremlin, largely because Israel viewed that line as strategically useful for deconfliction in Syria and for managing the Iranian file. It was not warmth.........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)