In 1929, when Romain Rolland’s “La Vie de Ramakrishna” emerged from Parisian publishing houses, it carried within its pages something far more radical than mere biographical scholarship. Here was a Nobel laureate, a towering figure of European letters, bending his considerable intellectual apparatus not to explain away the ecstasies of a Bengali mystic, but to render them comprehensible ~ even necessary ~ to a Western world stumbling blindly toward the abyss of its second great war.

The book was an act of translation in the deepest sense: not merely linguistic, but civilizational. Rolland came to Ramakrishna through the labyrinthine pathways of his own searching. By the 1920s, the author of “Jean-Christophe” had evolved from celebrated novelist into something more urgent: a conscience in exile. His uncompromising pacifism during the First World War had made him anathema in France, yet prescient everywhere. When the guns finally fell silent, leaving ten million dead and European humanism in tatters, Rolland was among those rare intellectuals willing to admit that Western civilization had catastrophically failed some fundamental test of its own values.

Advertisement

It was in this spiritual crisis that India appeared to him ~ not as the exotic periphery of colonial imagination, but as a repository of wisdom that might yet redeem humanity’s squandered inheritance. Through his correspondence with Rabindranath Tagore, and later with Gandhi himself, Rolland perceived in Hindu philosophy something that Christianity, bloodied by its complicity with nationalism and militarism, seemed incapable of providing: genuinely universal ethics grounded in the radical unity of all existence. What distinguishes Rolland’s treatment of Ramakrishna from earlier Western encounters with Hindu spirituality is his refusal to domesticate the saint’s strangeness.

Advertisement

Victorian orientalists had either dismissed yogic practice as primitive superstition or attempted to extract from Vedantic philosophy a pallid reasonableness that would satisfy Unitarian sensibilities. Rolland did neither. Instead, he presented Ramakrishna’s God-intoxication in all its scandalous particularity ~ the trance states lasting for days, the tears streaming at the mention of the Divine Mother, the utter dissolution of ego-boundaries that left this priest of Dakshineswar unable to handle money or maintain conventional social proprieties. Yet Rolland’s genius lay in demonstrating that this apparent madness encoded a sophisticated epistemology.

Ramakrishna’s mysticism was not an escape from reality but a more penetrating engagement with it. His famous dictum ~ “As many faiths, so many paths” ~ emerged not from liberal tolerance but from direct experiential knowledge. Ramakrishna had systematically practiced Islam and Christianity alongside multiple Hindu traditions, and found in each the same ineffable One. This was universalism earned through radical particularity, not abstract theorizing.

For Rolland, writing in the shadow of nationalist hatreds that had weaponized religious identities, this testimony carried explosive political implications. Ramakrishna had lived the solution to the very sectarianism tearing Europe ~ and increasingly........

© The Statesman