A viral email about a work-from-home “five-minute rule” lit up social feeds recently and was covered in prominent newspapers. The demand was that employees “notify the team” if they were going to be unavailable even for just a few minutes — even just to take a bathroom break.

Such policies confuse motion for progress and fear for leadership. They also collide with basic human needs and well-established research on what actually creates productive, high-trust teams. The backlash shows a natural reaction to rules that treat adults like children and confuse instant replies with real results.

Such monitoring promises clarity but instead delivers strain. A 2022 meta-analysis of electronic monitoring across 70 independent samples tied surveillance to higher stress, lower job satisfaction and more counterproductive behavior. The pattern shows up in broader psychology summaries as well. The American Psychological Association describes how continuous monitoring communicates distrust, constrains autonomy and links to burnout.

What managers choose to do with data changes outcomes. When monitoring feeds control and discipline, employees disengage and even push back. But when the same information supports coaching, relationships hold and performance improves. That distinction appears in an analysis that contrasts control-oriented uses of monitoring with feedback-oriented uses. Leaders face a choice between signaling respect or suspicion — and the signal matters more than any dashboard.

Rules that police bodily functions create additional risk. U.S. workplace regulations require prompt access to restroom facilities. Remote status changes neither biology nor law. Policies that force adults to........

© The Hill