menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

The Army’s acquisition process for new weapons systems is still broken

4 0
01.08.2025

To the surprise of many, the U.S. Army, long considered to be the most bureaucratically hidebound of the military services, appears to have successfully reoriented itself toward the demands of a potential war in the western Pacific.

For example, at this month’s Talisman Sabre military exercise with Australia and Singapore, the Army employed its Typhon missile system, which entered service in 2023, to sink a maritime target at a distance of over 100 miles. And in that same exercise, it employed the HIMARS rocket artillery system in conjunction with the other two nations to demonstrate interoperability among them.

Recognizing the growing threat from China, the Army began to reorient itself during the Biden administration and has therefore easily and quickly adapted itself to the Trump administration’s priorities.

But notwithstanding its strategic reorientation, the Army’s acquisition processes continue to suffer from a long-standing inability to consistently field major new weapons systems. The Army continues to operate Abrams tanks, Bradley infantry fighting vehicles and Apache helicopters that, although upgraded over the years, are fundamentally products of the mid-1970s.

The list of failed Army programs is both long and troubling. In 1982, the Department of Defense canceled the Roland........

© The Hill