The idea of serving the public has been baked into the bones of journalism ever since the profession was created.

Whether it was quality information to inform the citizenry, or sensationalism and gossip, newsrooms and editors have had the desires and needs of their audiences, noble and ignoble, front of mind.

But this relationship is changing in important and dangerous ways – the latest change in 50 years of technology-driven disruption to our media and public life.

Let me explain.

If you use a search engine such as Google, you will have noticed that in recent times when you ask for information on a topic you are served a neat precis of the main facts at the head of the search results. There are links for further information if you want it, but most people are content with the summary.

The summary is written by artificial intelligence – by robots – which comb the work of humans, including the work of journalists, to compose the key points.

That means that fewer people are clicking through to news media outlets in search of the news. So far the trend is small, but everyone expects it to increase. And that undermines media business models. Fewer eyeballs on a media organisation’s website or app means fewer subscribers and fewer advertisers willing to pay to reach the diminishing audience.

Let’s leave aside, for the moment, the issue of accuracy of the robot-generated summaries, because most of them are accurate enough. The bloopers are embarrassingly bad, sometimes dangerous, but also increasingly rare.

This is because the AI companies – Google, OpenAI and the rest – are signing deals with media companies that allow them to use content written by journalists, including decades of media archives, to train and feed their robots.

Most of the big media companies have signed some kind of deal, and it is easy........

© The Guardian