The latest US-Iran exchange and Benjamin Netanyahu's avowed shift from containment to persistent prevention make the 1996 strategy paper newly relevant not as a secret script for history, but as the genealogy of a security model that risks turning war into the arrangement itself

Arshad Zaman’s recent writ-up, A Clean Break: The 1996 American Blueprint for Israel to Lebanonize the Region, performs a useful service by returning attention to a document often mentioned but seldom actually read. His central evidence is genuine. A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm was prepared in 1996 by an American study group led by Richard Perle for the newly elected Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It recommended abandoning the prevailing “land for peace” approach in favour of balance-of-power politics, weakening Syria, removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and restoring pre-emption as an instrument of Israeli strategy.

The document has acquired new relevance in September 2026. A month of relative military quiet between the United States and Iran has ended in another cycle of strikes and counter-strikes. US forces have attacked Iranian radar, missile and mine-deployment capabilities around the Strait of Hormuz; Iran has replied with missiles and drones against US positions, including in Jordan. President Donald Trump says the renewed campaign will not last long, while leaving open the prospect of further heavy strikes. The contradiction captures the central problem of a conflict in which every pause is treated as an interval for rebuilding and every rebuilt capability as a reason to attack again.

That problem is sharper because Netanyahu himself has publicly announced a change in Israel’s security doctrine. In June he said Israel now “initiate[s]”, attacks and surprises adversaries before they can act. In July, speaking in Dimona, he described a “new concept” in which defensive envelopes are pushed inside Gaza, Lebanon and Syria and defined the new path as one of “initiative, action, and attack, not containment”. This is an avowed shift from deterrence and retaliation towards forward defence and persistent prevention.

Arshad Zaman does not claim that every subsequent Middle Eastern war mechanically followed the 1996 paper. He notes that ‘A Clean Break’ was never formally adopted as Israeli government policy and calls it a “mindset more than a fixed template”. His stronger point concerns continuity of personnel: Perle, Douglas Feith and David Wurmser later entered influential American policymaking circles associated with the Iraq War.

There is........

© The Friday Times