1 Trending: Gorsuch Skewers SCOTUS For Ducking Covid Shot Mandate Case

2 Trending: California Races To Neuter An Office That A Conservative Might Win

3 Trending: New Study: Immigration Caused 40% Of Your Rent Hikes Over 10 Years

4 Trending: Daughters Of The American Revolution Betrays Its Mission By Rejecting Resolution To Keep Its Ranks Female

‘Erroneous’ SCOTUS Ruling On Election Day Ballots Screams For SAVE Act

Von Spakovsky said that Barrett’s ‘unfortunate’ opinion ‘makes it even more important that the U.S. Senate pass the SAVE Act.’

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

In siding with their colleagues on the left in a critical election integrity case, Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined forces with the “living Constitution” camp bent on rewriting the Constitution and razing the 250-year-old republic.  

Barrett, proving to be more of an OINO — originalist in name only — wrote the 5-4 majority opinion damning U.S. elections to the Californication of ballot counting and further shaking voter confidence in a system wide open to fraud. 

The ruling in RNC v. Mississippi acknowledges that Election Day is indeed Election Day as proscribed by federal law but ruled that the law does not “set a deadline for ballot receipt.” In short, Mississippi can keep collecting ballots days after an election. So can California, which just this month drove home why a prolonged ballot receipt policy is a disaster for election integrity — and the constitutional republic. 

The first opinion is in Watson v. RNC, the mail-in ballot case. The court holds that nothing in the federal election-day statutes requires ballots to be received by Election Day in order to be counted. https://t.co/m8satOKkrQ— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 29, 2026

The first opinion is in Watson v. RNC, the mail-in ballot case. The court holds that nothing in the federal election-day statutes requires ballots to be received by Election Day in order to be counted. https://t.co/m8satOKkrQ

“Today’s ruling from the Supreme Court is deeply disappointing and misses the mark. Federal law is clear: all ballots must be received by Election Day to be counted,” Jason Snead, executive director of Honest Elections Project (HEP), said in a statement following Monday’s ruling. “The Court missed a major opportunity to reinforce election integrity and instead sides with California-style chaos.

“As Justice Alito makes clear in his dissent, watching ballots trickle in after Election Day and flip races does........

© The Federalist