menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Women, Babies At Risk After SCOTUS Authorizes Mail-Order Abortion For Now

8 0
15.05.2026

1 Trending: Democrats Tell Pollsters They’d Happily Ditch Black Districts To Get More Power

2 Trending: Dem Frontrunner Floats Packing SCOTUS, Nuking Electoral College As 2028 Platform

3 Trending: Trump DOJ Challenges Leftist ‘Barfare’ With Lawsuit Targeting Jeff Clark’s DC Persecutors

4 Trending: Far-Left Academics Wrote Scientific Advisory Guide Used To Influence Judges

Women, Babies At Risk After SCOTUS Authorizes Mail-Order Abortion For Now

Justice Samuel Alito reprimanded his colleagues by dubbing their “unreasoned order granting stays in this case” as “remarkable.”

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

Online abortion pill sellers can continue illegally trafficking mifepristone into pro-life states until litigation over a landmark abortion drug lawsuit out of Louisiana is resolved, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday. The high bench’s grant of mifepristone manufacturers’ emergency appeal endangers women and babies who are not required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to receive in-person medical care before or after obtaining abortion pills.

The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals initially paused the FDA’s mail-order abortion permissions when it unanimously granted Louisiana’s request for a stay at the beginning of May. Two days later, the Supreme Court temporarily halted the 5th Circuit’s block.

After hearing briefs from both sides, the Supreme Court ruled seven to two on Thursday evening that mifepristone manufacturers had demonstrated enough of a case for emergency relief from the 5th Circuit’s intervention by claiming “substantial financial interest.” Under this ruling, the radically relaxed abortion pill policies introduced by the Biden administration and allowed to stand under the Trump FDA will remain while the case is further litigated in the 5th Circuit.

SCOTUS may not have weighed in on the merits of the case, but dissenting Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito did not hold back on chastising the majority for its decision.........

© The Federalist