In conflict zones, the first casualty is often clarity. When, recently, the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan expressed concern over alleged civilian casualties along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, it performed a duty intrinsic to its humanitarian mandate. Protecting non-combatants is not optional; it is foundational to international law and moral responsibility. Yet concern divorced from context can harden into selective outrage. A statement that measures impact without examining cause risks presenting a fragmented portrait of a deeply layered conflict. The tragedy of civilian harm must be acknowledged without hesitation, but so too must the chain of events that produces it. Civilian protection cannot be meaningfully defended if the forces that endanger civilians are left unnamed or unexamined.

For more than a decade, Pakistan has confronted a relentless insurgency spearheaded by the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan. These assaults are not abstract security incidents; they are funerals in Peshawar, grieving households in Quetta, and shuttered markets in Bannu. Police officers, soldiers, teachers, labourers and children have fallen victim to bombings and targeted killings that seek to fracture the social fabric.

According to the Institute for Economics and Peace in its Global Terrorism Index 2025, more than one thousand lives were lost to terrorism in Pakistan in 2024, with the TTP responsible for over half of those fatalities. The Pakistan Institute for Peace Studies has similarly documented hundreds of attacks annually,........

© The Express Tribune