"Employees Actually Do Not Have the Right to Believe That LGBTQ Rights Are 'Immoral'"
The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
About The Volokh Conspiracy Editorial Independence Who we are Books Volokh Daily Email Archives Search DMCA RSS
Free Speech
"Employees Actually Do Not Have the Right to Believe That LGBTQ Rights Are 'Immoral'"
The Ninth Circuit allows a religious discrimination claim against Alaska Airlines to go forward, based on its firing of Christian flight attendants who objected on a company-run intranet to the company's statement in favor of a federal ban on sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination.
Eugene Volokh | 6.29.2026 8:32 AM
Some excerpts from Wednesday's long Ninth Circuit opinion in Brown v. Alaska Airlines, Inc., written by Judge Daniel Bress and joined by Judge Kenneth Lee and, in large part, by Judge Morgan Christen:
Alaska … maintains an internal intranet communication network that it calls Alaska's World. Alaska's World is visible to all Alaska employees, with the company describing it as a "key vehicle for employee communications."
Alaska posts messages on Alaska's World, and employees are invited to reply and comment. Alaska explained to employees that the "[c]omments are here for us to openly and constructively share ideas, ask respectful questions, and understand one another and our company." According to Alaska's employee guidance on posting, "[w]e're a big team, inclusive of many people and perspectives," and "[o]ur differences make us better when we support and respect each other, allowing each of us to be who we are." The company has expressed its commitment to providing "a safe space culture where employees feel empowered to have open and critical dialogue with their peers and leaders." …
On February 25, 2021, Alaska posted on Alaska's World to announce the company's support for the Equality Act. The Equality Act is proposed federal legislation that would extend certain federal nondiscrimination requirements to cover discrimination involving sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity in various contexts…. As was typical for Alaska's World posts, Alaska allowed its employees to comment on the company's Equality Act announcement.
Plaintiffs Marli Brown and Lacey Smith are Christians who worked as flight attendants at Alaska Airlines for eight and six years, respectively…. Shortly after Alaska posted about the Equality Act on Alaska's World, Smith posted in response: "As a company, do you think it's possible to regulate morality?" Smith's comment prompted responses on Alaska's World from other commenters, some of whom expressed disagreement…. Alaska did not initially remove Smith's post but instead decided to respond to it on Alaska's World, [writing] …:
Supporting the Equality Act is not about regulating morality. It's about supporting laws that allow our LGBTQ employees and guests, no matter what state they live in or fly to, to be protected against discrimination. Our values are our guide, and we strongly believe that doing the right thing and being kind-hearted require us to support this act. As we said above, we aren't the kind of company that stands by and watches—we're going to use our voice and be a leader on these issues.
We also expect our employees to live by these same values. Our differences are to be respected. As stated in our People Policies, harassment and discrimination will not be tolerated.
In internal Alaska emails discussing this draft, Taylor Ball of Alaska's legal department wrote, "Employees actually do not have the right to believe that LGBTQ rights are 'immoral,'" to which Carmen Williams, Alaska's Vice President of Inflight replied, "I 100% agree."
Later that day, plaintiff Marli Brown independently saw Alaska's post and … felt religiously compelled to post a response[, writing]........
